• Thrife@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Before Ai Pinterest had stolen pictures without crediting or linking to the real artists while this shit got pushed to every image search. I hope this will be its final nail in the coffin.

    • falcunculus@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      A big issue with AI is precisely how just a few people can inundate the rest of us with their mass-produced slurry of AI content.

      • hoefnix@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        Just like photography did once remove the painter from making a selfie 🤷🏼 The tools are not the problem, it’s the users that think they should put everything online as if it is a big achievement.

        • falcunculus@jlai.lu
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          Yes, I agree. OK, now let’s say 99% of users online agree that low quality content shouldn’t be posted online. And then imagine there is some kind of technology that allows the 1% of “bad users” (the ones who don’t care about low quality) to upload a thousand times more than other users can. It would follow that 90% of content online would be from these users that only represent 1% of the population. Do you see the problem?

          • hoefnix@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            Pinterest was already a sinkhole, best to be avoided. My problem is de statement that the OP made. AI isn’t the problem, its the people that think their rubbish is great and push it into our face so to speak. If someone builds a crappy shed, we can blame the hammer but in reality it is the self-appointed carpenter that created the mess.

        • petrol_sniff_king@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          What is your genius solution to handle these naughty users, then?

          If you fail to respond within 3 business days, we will continue with our plan to nuke OpenAI from orbit.

          • hoefnix@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            Where did I say I have a solution… I know at least one thing, and that is that blaming AI for this definitely wont solve anything.

              • hoefnix@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                3 months ago

                I guess removing hammers will do away with poorly built sheds as well. Good idea, let’s do it, removing all tooling in the world that might have a sub-optimal result.

                • petrol_sniff_king@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  No, there’s no need for that. I don’t see how banning hammers would help with Internet spam—just the AI will do.

                  You can’t catch me in a logical trap here, hoefnix, because there isn’t one. I’m mom saying you aren’t allowed to play with silly string in the house; it’s too much to clean up.

    • tasho@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      but actual artwork does exist? so when you want art references for style references, why should you be forced to see a bunch of AI?