Only technology itself. Do not include any human being associated with that technology

  • scytale@piefed.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    1 day ago

    Hard synths vs soft synths. Hard synth purists scoff at soft synths because they are not “authentic” and merely simulations. Soft synth snobs scoff at hard synth users because they are old timers who can’t move on to the future. Both are fine, do what you want. At the end of the day, what matters is if the music you produce is actually good.

    • scintilla@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      24 hours ago

      truly pointless would be vim vs neovim. I’m sure they are different somehow and that it really matters to someone though.

        • filtoid@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          21 hours ago

          One thing that made me laugh was that “Emacs is a great OS lacking only a decent text-editor”, but from your comment it seems that’s been fixed!

        • jbrains@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          21 hours ago

          I was a kak user for several years and am giving hx an honest try this year. So far, I’m quite happy.

          (and yes, I’ve been both an emacs and vim user.)

  • Random Dent@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    21 hours ago

    Gnome vs KDE, just use whichever one suits your flow. Or not, grab Cinnamon or Hyprland if that floats your boat. Options are good!

    • lichtmetzger@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      19 hours ago

      If it comes to using the DE of your choice, I totally agree. But there have been numerous instances where Gnome developers act like entitled bitches, because the rest of the open-source community doesn’t want to adhere to their standards.

      When the Gnome devs say we don’t need a system tray, it’s law! (even though an extension for it has been downloaded over 700.000 times so far. Fuck the actual users, I guess.)

    • lichtmetzger@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      19 hours ago

      The debate is already over. xorg is on life support, the XLibre fork is run by a guy with weird political views (so a lot of people don’t want to work with him) and Nvidia also said they will not support it.

      Wayland still lacks some features (e.g. good RDP support), but it will mature and get adopted even more.

    • CarrotsHaveEars@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      21 hours ago

      I don’t think it’s over. Some distros are reluctant to ship it by default because its user base also strongly thinks so. Gentoo, Void, Alpine, and Devuan, to name a few. It’s pointless to “persuade” other people to do the same, so we just use what we feel right.

  • Tenderizer78@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    17 hours ago

    The “generative” AI debate.

    Most of the criticisms are misleading and hyperbolic (if not straight up counter-productive), and it has zero real use cases other than making the internet useless by filling it with thousands of scam websites. I guess it could also be used to give you a TLDR of things. Either way though nothing we do or say is going to change things since the technology is already out there.