As Twitter ditches its iconic branding in favor of owner Elon Musk’s favorite letter “X,” its open source competitor Mastodon is once again seeing usage numbers soar.

    • Gacrux@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      71
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      believe it or not its more likely they straight up ripped off U+1D54F MATHEMATICAL DOUBLE-STRUCK CAPITAL X:

      𝕏

      absolutely no creativity. at least threads drew the ring in @ clockwise instead of the usual anticlockwise

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        43
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Saw this on Mastodon:

        Important sets:

        ℂ the complex numbers

        ℕ the natural numbers

        ℚ the rational numbers

        ℝ the real numbers

        𝕏 the set of fascists wannabes

        ℤ the integers

        • Beto@lemmy.studio
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          29
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          My favorite comment about this from Mastodon: “X is just a sans serif swastika”.

        • Gork@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          I would argue that ℤ would also be the set of Russian fascist wannabes.

      • IverCoder@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        1 year ago

        Imagine a billionaire approving that “logo” despite how uncreative it is. Like get a better graphic designer I guess?

        • Gacrux@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          27
          ·
          1 year ago

          only difference between billionaires and normal people is that billionaires have a lot of money. best not to assume they have above-average logo appreciation skills. although they could hire some good advisors i suppose

          • teuast@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            yeah but then they’d be spending money to be told they might not be 100% right and perfect 100% of the time, and that’s just a waste of money