• Nawor3565@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    Unfortunately, even OpenAI themselves took down their AI detection tool because it was too inaccurate. It’s really, REALLY hard to detect AI writing with current technology, so any such addon would probably need to use a master list of articles that are manually flagged by human.

      • apis@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Suspect it would operate more on the basis of a person confirming that the article is of reasonable quality & accuracy.

        So not unlike editors selecting what to publish, what to reject & what to send back for improvements.

        If good articles by AI get accepted & poor articles by people get rejected, there may still be impacts, but at face value it might be sufficient for us seeking to read stuff.

  • monobot@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    I think at some point we will have to introduce human confirmation from creator side.

    I don’t mind someone using chatgpt as a tool to write better articles, but most of internet is sensles bs.

  • Cwilliams@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I know there’s GPT Zero. I personally don’t trust it at all, but you could still look into it

  • Cwilliams@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Another thought: does it really matter if it’s AI generated or not? As long as you can fact-check the content and the quality isn’t horrible, I don’t see why it matters if it’s written by a real person or not