“The term natural gas does not explicitly convey the fossil origins of such gas, leading to potential misunderstandings and hampering policy-making,”

    • CraigeryTheKid@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      reminds me of a personal story - I’ve been telling my dad to lose weight / eat healthier for years. we go to a fast food joint, and he orders 2 sandwiches and fries.

      I tell him that’s way too much food.

      My mom, points to the fries, and says “these are healthy though, these are SWEET POTATO fries”. Straight-faced, unironic, like it completely answered my concern.

      People are surprisingly stupid.

      • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah when it wants to be. When it is not insisting that nouns of things that don’t have genders have genders. Die Pizza. It doesn’t have a vagina, stop pretending that it does.

  • roguetrick@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    Do folks think we’re bottling cow farts? Wood gas is about the only non fossil gas we use (though sewer gas lamps still exist I think.)

    • kakes@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      From the article:

      “They would really resist. They just started saying the most amazing things back to me, like, ‘But it’s natural,’ or ‘It’s green, it’s good,’” he said.

      I generally try not to talk down to people, but jesus christ how ignorant can these people possibly be? Do they think just because it isn’t literally coal that it’s somehow beneficial? Who educated them? Absolutely wild.

      • roguetrick@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s funny to me, because when it was coined, natural gas made SENSE. See town gas, the majority of gas used in cities, was made at gas plants from coal or wood and piped to homes as a clean burning fuel. You’d have gas plants that created the gas. Natural gas, therefore, was just gas that was natural and not made vs the syngas that most people had used. It wasn’t some sort of nefarious marketing ploy, it was just an apt description of where the gas came from.

        Edit: and to clarify, natural gas was a whole hell of a lot safer than town gas. The ole head in the oven suicide trope was based on town gas having a high percentage of carbon monoxide.

      • MelodiousFunk@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Who educated them?

        I think the most common answer for this topic would be, “No one, really.” Except maybe energy marketing/ads. You know, the folks that brought us “clean coal” and “fracking is totally safe and will definitely not bork your groundwater.”

      • WashedOver@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Not being familiar with all things oil and gas would be pretty common for people not living in areas where it is processed or compressed. It’s much like a Linux enthusiast being upset at Windows and Mac users not realizing there are other OSs for computers. Might not be in their realm of thought.

        Natural has been a wonderfully misleading marketing term for food products too. There’s no regulations in the US on what one calls “natural” ingredients. Most people mistake it for being like organic just as intended. Natural just sounds good. Unfortunately radioactive material can be natural too.

        • kakes@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          You got me there, I am indeed from Alberta, Canada. Do people really not have any idea where the fuel they use every day comes from? Maybe I’m just more curious than others, I guess.

          To be clear, I don’t disagree with changing the term to something less misleading. Just surprised is all.

  • masquenox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s a good idea. Words are extremely powerful - by dictating what something is called, you can frame a given narrative as this or that before any education on said narrative has even occured. People think it’s nitpicky, but it’s not - they pay propagandists a lot of money to come up with words.