• aleq@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Reasonable and sane behavior of cd. Just get into the habit of always using lower case names for files and directories, that’s how our forefathers did it.

    • jonne@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      It’s a default on some distros, unfortunately, and changing it without updating the necessary env vars will break a bunch of stuff.

  • HatFunction@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    This is completely unrelated to the meme at hand, but the title just reminded me that for a while, Merriam-Webster mistakenly included the word “Dord” to mean density - because an editor misread the entry for “D or d” as an abbreviation of density.

    Wikipedia

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I am regularly disappointed that the word games I play on my phone don’t accept ‘dord.’ They should, damn it! One of them accepts Jedi, ffs!

  • Codex@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I love how many people brought up the Turkish “I” as if everyone here is on the Unicode steering committee or just got jobs for Turkish facebook.

    I, an English speaker, have personally solved the problem by not having a Turkish I in the name of my Downloads directory, or any other directory that I need to cd into on my computer. I’m going to imagine the Turks solve it by painstakingly typing the correct I, or limiting their use of uppercase I’s in general.

    In fact, researching the actual issue for more than 1 second seemingly shows that Unicode basically created this problem themselves because the two I’s are just seperate letters in Turkic languages. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dotted_and_dotless_I_in_computing

    If you nerds think this is bad try doing Powershell for any amount of time. It is entirely case-insensitive.

    • yum13241@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Why the FUCK did they make characters that look the same have different codepointers in UNICODE? They should’ve done what they did in CJK and make duplicates have the same codepointer.

      Unicode needs a redo.

      • Trantarius@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Well letters don’t really have a single canonical shape. There are many acceptable ways of rendering each. While two letters might usually look the same, it is very possible that some shape could be acceptable for one but not the other. So, it makes sense to distinguish between them in binary representation. That allows the interpreting software to determine if it cares about the difference or not.

        Also, the Unicode code tables do mention which characters look (nearly) identical, so it’s definitely possible to make a program interpret something like a Greek question mark the same as a semicolon. I guess it’s just that no one has bothered, since it’s such a rare edge case.

          • mrpants@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            In cases where something looks stupid but your knowledge on it is almost zero it’s entirely possible that it’s not.

            The people that maintain Unicode have put a lot of thought and effort into this. Might be helpful to research why rather than assuming you have a better way despite little knowledge of the subject.