It’s more important than ever to understand what ChatGPT and other AI tools like it are actually doing when they talk to us and write for us.
I worked with some Large Language Models and GPTs and dug into what they’re doing, and I wrote this article. I try to explain in the simplest terms possible what modern AIs actually are and how exactly they construct their content so we can move past the fear and confusion about what AI is capable of and start using it for what it’s actually good for.
Please arm yourself with knowledge and understanding, and share this with someone who worries about AI taking over their job (or even the whole world)!
I find it very accurate for cooking related tasks. I find it to be 90-95% on even the wildest recipes. And developing flavour profiles is something it’s also very good at.
I know that’s not a huge thing for most people but recipe sites are so terrible and flooded with trash I appreciate the time saved. I bring this up because the article suggests it should only be used as a starting point.
deleted by creator
Youve heard about llama right?
Isn’t that open source?
Exactly.
Quite the opposite of what most of us would expect from suckerbergs metaverse
Well done, appreciate the sharing of knowledge. Kinda wish you would’ve dove into Stabble Diffusion image generation as it’s one of the most popular and powerful techniques out there, although it’s not a GPT. Maybe some other time! Looking forward to your next work 😊
This article is full of errors!
At its core, an LLM is a big (“large”) list of phrases and sentences
Definitely not! An LLM is the combination of an architecture and its model parameters. It’s just a bunch of numbers, no list of sentences, no database. (Seems like the author confused the word “LLM” with the dataset of the LLM???)
an LLM is a storage space (“database”) containing as many sample documents as possible
Nope. This applies to the dataset, not the model. I guess you can argue that memorization happens sometimes, so it might have some features of a database. But it isn’t one.
Additional data (like the topic, mood, tone, source, or any number of other ways to categorize the documents) can be provided
LLMs are trained in an unsupervised fashion. Just sequences of tokens, no labels.
Typically, an LLM will cover a single context, e.g. only social media
I’m not aware of any LLM that does this. What’s the “context” of GPT-4?
software developers have gone to great lengths to collect an unfathomable number of sample texts and meticulously categorize those samples in as many ways as possible
The closest real thing is the RLHF process that is used to fine tune an existing LLM for a specific application (like ChatGPT). The dataset for the LLM is not annotated or categorized in any way.
a GPT uses the words and proximity data stored in LLMs
This is confusing. “GPT” is the architecture of the LLM.
it is impossible for it to create something never seen before
This isn’t accurate, depending on the temperature setting, an LLM can output literally any word at any time with a non-zero probability. It can absolutely produce things it hasn’t seen.
Also I think it’s too simple to just assert that LLMs are not intelligent. It mostly depends on your definition of intelligence and there are lots of philosophical discussions to be had (see also the AI effect).
People are absolutely “needed”. The thing is you can make people 1000% more efficient, which means you need fewer of them. And the quality is often “good enough”. Especially when the goal is nothing but spamming your way to the top of SEO lists.
Also this whole idea that AI can’t create anything original completely missed the fact that humans can’t either. By the time you’re old enough to write, you’ve already been influenced by thousands of other people. That is unless you’re born to nomads who live out in the wilderness alone, at which point your original content is probably very boring, shallow and linear.
deleted by creator
I turned off auto-correct because it changed "Mary"to “Mark.” Like… wtf!
Of course, now I’m being forced to type properly and learn to spell. Win situation for me, in reality, but it’s also super annoying
One quick typo I noticed: “For reference, one letter is a byte and a gigabyte is roughly a trillion bytes”. That’s billion of course.
Otherwise, great article!
1,073,741,824 bytes to be exact - not to brag, but knowing that number off by heart is my personal nerd street-cred.
that’s a gibibyte
a gigabyte is 10^9
It was a gigabyte first, before those heckin’ marketing people came around.
But yes, you’re right.
