• ara@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Yeah, that would make sense as opening TCP connections is not really viable for low latency, hahaha.

      • taladar@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        11 months ago

        Opening the connections is one thing but resends and stream ordering can also cause issues since they might delay the latest information reaching the user space application even if the packet for them has actually arrived just because some earlier packet has not. There can also be issues with implementations waiting for enough data to be available before sending a packet.

      • Atemu@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        11 months ago

        Depends. There was that one F2P COD clone which used TCP and IIRC it did fine?

        • icydefiance@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          11 months ago

          If your connection is stable, the latency will more or less be the same, but TCP will consume more bandwidth because of acknowledgement packets, making it harder to keep your connection stable.

          On an unstable connection, TCP latency will skyrocket as it resends packets, while UDP will just drop those packets unless the game engine has its own way of resending them. Most engines have that, but they only do it for data that is marked as “important”. For example using an item is important, but the position of your character probably isn’t, because it’ll be updated on the next tick anyway.