Private trackers are well known for their elitist and insufferable users. I’d like to know the reasons behind their gatekeeping. Is it just mere elitism to feel superior or are there any other reasons? I’ve heard people saying they like to have a smaller number of high quality users for long term stability. I’ve even heard people tell they’re designed to keep government and federal agents away. I’d like to hear your thoughts.

  • themachine@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    54
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    Are you asking about why private trackers are private or are you asking about why a handful of people were mean to you who also happened to use a private tracker?

    Edit: typo

      • themachine@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        33
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        The primary reason a private track is private is to make it feasible to maintain a curated community. Many users are not good torrent citizens. Many users are not good netizens in the first place. More than a few will look to actively do harm. Keeping a mostly closed community allows the vetting of users and those who end up breaking the rules are dealt with swiftly.

        The extra barrier of entry also helps prevent bad actors from operating on the site. This is of course not a full proof thing but it is obviously much better than a public site.

        Additionally running a private tracker and site takes server resources that are not free. Limiting the total number of users is a way of maintaining uptime by staying within your operational limits.

        I’m sure there are other benefits for private trackers but these are at least a few.

        I am not going to explain why someone on the internet was mean to you. Given the tone of this post I wouldn’t be surprised if it was deserved.

        • matey@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          9 months ago

          Also curating the content itself, not just the users. Mods/Staff can make sure that the content uploaded is actually what’s expected.

  • Steve@communick.news
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    Nearly all the rules members need to follow (which can vary from one tracker to another) are about seeding enough. That’s the main universal thing. Not allowing people to “Hit and Run”. For a member to do that, it typically takes dedicating some substantial drive space and seed time. Far more than most people are willing/able to dedicate. This allows the tracker to curate a large library of high quality material. That’s the primary ideology.

    Secondary to that, it has the added benefit of making sure everyone involved is “cool”. Cool as in, not a nark who’s going to get people sued and the site shut down. That used to be a big issue. I don’t know if it is now. I’m kind of out of touch with public torrent sites.

    As to why we’re insufferable elitists? What do you want me to say? Rulers’ gonna rule.

  • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    9 months ago

    I’ve heard people saying they like to have a smaller number of high quality users for long term stability. I’ve even heard people tell they’re designed to keep government and federal agents away.

    These are both true, although the second one isn’t “government agents” but “third party companies hired by rightsholders like the RIAA/MPA.”

    • Digital_Prophet@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      9 months ago

      This. It’s not like 3rd party anti-piracy firms can’t get in if they want- which is why you still need to use a VPN on public trackers- but they exist to make money with the least amount of effort, just like every other corporation. They can trawl public trackers with almost no effort, and that’s where the vast majority of users are anyway, so they’re much more likely to go after the lower hanging fruit.

  • rambos@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    9 months ago

    People call private tracker users gatekeepers a lot. While thats true sometimes, its bullshit most of the time IMO. There are some trackers with open signups (sometimes), some require interview to join and some provide free invites to all users. If you join one, you get a chance to join another one. There are some that are “impossible” to join, but who cares if they want to stay small or whatever. Private trackers are not gold mine, almost all content is available elswhere, sometimes trackers go down or site is not working, sometimes they disappear forever.

    Tracker wouldnt be private if anyone can join, having too many people might lead to take down. Having more people than needed (for healthy tracker) is just extra risk probably. Users more likely keep their account(s) healthy and follow the rules (like ratio and hit&run), they donate to tracker and they are willing to pay for a seedbox, thats why its better than public trackers IMO. All (10+) people I have invited got banned because they didnt care about anything there (mostly inactivity for months) and they are happy with public trackers or they moved to a payed service.

    Private trackers are not for everyone, if you cba go for public or pay for usenet. If you are into movies/tv shows, setup *arr stack with VPN and public trackers and you will enjoy it the same way as anyone on private trackers. If you are nerd like me and have patience, dont mind keeping your torrent client online look into private trackers

  • Nakoichi [they/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    9 months ago

    I’ve even heard people tell they’re designed to keep government and federal agents away.

    more likely that they are trying to stay off the radar of big ip holders. That is who would shine the feds eye of sauron on you and if the feds want to look at your files they will.

  • driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    9 months ago

    I used to visit an specialized private tracker that went offline, deli.sh, it’s had only food content, like video courses and a lot of books. Everything had at least a couple of seeders, so even that ultra rare French language pastry book was available to download. My girlfriend, now wife, was on cooking academy and I downloaded a lot of books and courses for her that would be unavailable anywhere else on the internet. I don’t think you can really have that kind of collection on a public tracker.

  • hexaflexagonbear [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    9 months ago

    Is it just mere elitism to feel superior or are there any other reasons?

    Security concerns are a part of it. The idea is that there’s an added layer of security if everyone is a friend of a friend, but obviously it’s not very practical. Generally the security is added by making sure you’re drafting from an “in”-crowd, which usually means familiarity with the content hosted and how the content is generated (like the old what.cd test) in addition to being a member in good standing in a tracker or a proven history of seeding. User limits also make the need for people to be very into the specific content type in order to make sure even the more obscure content is well seeded.

  • Diurnambule@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    9 months ago

    It is hard to find films with specific languages on public trackers. They are private one in some languages only.

  • FuckyWucky [none/use name]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    It’s bullshit. You’ll get 99% of the content well seeded on a relatively open private tracker like IPT or Torrentleech as you would on BTN and anyone who says otherwise just wants to feel they are part of the cool kids club or whatever.

    And certain nzb indexers are even more annoyingly elitist, see nzbs.in who get mad and ban users for even mentioning their name.

    • calm.like.a.bomb@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 months ago

      You’ll get 99% of the content well seeded

      In my case, I love to be on private trackers because of the content and moderation. You will not find 99% of the music on RED or even OPS at that level of quality anywhere on the public trackers. Hell, I don’t even find a lot of the music in lossless formats on usenet.

      So, one of the reasons for the existence of private trackers is to catalogue and moderate great collections (of music, movies, TV series, etc.).

  • Onii-Chan@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    9 months ago

    I was a member of What.CD back in the day, and holy fuck, the elitism was insufferable… but the amount of genuine lossless music was unlike anywhere else, and the site was so well organized.

    • Stern@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      I was on 32pag.es before it died, and it an amazing comic tracker, still haven’t found comparable in public yet.

  • reverendz [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    9 months ago

    There’s also a “I’m not going to get some bullshit masquerading as the movie I was looking for.” thing in place.

    I belong to a couple private trackers. I use them nearly exclusively and have never once downloaded a bullshit file/virus/whatever. It’s happened a couple times on public ones.

    I know who the good uploaders are and know that seeding on the private isn’t going to get me flagged to my ISP, which happened twice before going off public.

    I guess what I’m wondering is: why wouldn’t you use one if you can find what you’re looking for?