Context:
Somebody made a post promoting the proprietary search engine they are working on, claiming in the post that it “would make Stallman smile”. In a comment below the post they said that they made the statement about Stallman to “drive engagement”. The post was later removed for promoting proprietary software.
Image description:
At the top is a screenshot from the modlog saying:
Removed Post We’re building a search engine to compete with DuckDuckGo. No JS, no WASM, no spying. Just a statically generated results page.
reason: Comm rule 2: Don’t promote proprietary software
Below that is an image of Stallman smiling.
You must log in or # to comment.
proprietary search engine
it “would make Stallman smile”
So do they just know absolutely nothing about RMS?
What about Root Mean Square? Are we cleaning signals?
maybe they’re really into creepy sexist jokes and defending paedophiles and they figured RMS would overlook the licensing to support some fellow travelers…
Dude is 71 years old and has dedicated his life to establishing and promoting free software. Let it go. The only creep here is you.
I replied to that thread.
OP was claiming to be working on a static HTML-serving search engine. They suggested that because it’s just HTML and CSS, and that interested parties can use Inspect Element to read the network requests, that it constituted “open source”.
Commenters then got on his case about not open sourcing the server backend. OP defended that choice saying they didn’t want a competitor taking their code and building a company off of it that would “drive [them] out of business”. Uh-huh. So, proprietary software, then. Bye.
deleted by creator
Technically they are correct. None of the Open Source licenses really regulate what happens on the server. When it’s not you running the binary, all the licenses are basically useless. AGPL is one of the few that address this a little bit, but even there you only get the source code itself, when the value in most online services is in the databases and backend stuff that you still don’t get to access with AGPL.
The Free Software world hasn’t figured out what to do with services running on computers you don’t own. GDPR is so far the only thing does something about the server side, but that’s EU law, not a license you can slap onto your software.
Some commenter asked why they were using Brave. I saved it to check out the answer later, because I was curious, but now I’ll never know :(
Always real answer: they invested in BAT.
I’m so lost. Every reply but one so far reads like it was written by chatgpt
Immediately under your comment is someone talking about toenail chewing and I don’t think there’s any context that would make that make sense.
RMS became a meme once for eating his tonail at a conference
Foot skin, actually. I think he was peeling his heel.
Maybe in certain nsfw communities but c certainly not here lol
Coooooooool my first Lemmy drama!
So it was too good to be true? One tell is that they wrote: Check out xxx.onion that points to my laptop.
Lmao good one
This meme does not contain enough toenail chewing.
I mean why even when Stract is a thing
And that is…? First google result is something for google sheets, second result is a plugin for Chrome to extract data from ads.
https://github.com/StractOrg/stract
Don’t know enough to give a testimony on it. Majority or codebase is FOSS afaik. Sorta passed the sniff test? Free API is nice and works well, that’s enough for my purposes.
sex pest
Bullshit
