Israel’s restrictions on humanitarian aid for Gaza may amount to a starvation tactic that could be a war crime, the United Nations human rights chief said on Tuesday. The stark appraisal followed a U.N.-backed report on Monday saying famine is likely by May without an end to fighting in the more than five-month war between Israel and Hamas militants in the Palestinian enclave of 2.3 million people.
“The extent of Israel’s continued restrictions on entry of aid into Gaza, together with the manner in which it continues to conduct hostilities, may amount to the use of starvation as a method of war, which is a war crime,” said the U.N. High Commissioner for Human Rights, Volker Turk.
While aid agencies blame Israel for blockading Gaza, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s government says it is facilitating aid and the United Nations and relief groups are at fault for any issues over the quantity and pace of delivery.

  • Maeve@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    8 months ago

    That’s a good point. I may or not have decently functional ASD (I can’t afford testing), but there is significant symptom overlap with other conditions; and had a significant head injury about sixteen months ago, and my brain has gotten lazy, at any rate. I’m beginning to exercise it a little more, and more intensely for a few upcoming months. Thank you for pointing out what should have been obvious.

    • livus@kbin.socialOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      @Maeve it’s not necessarily obvious - many people think I am wrong, and that the status quo can not shift that far in the next 60 years.

      Sorry to hear about the head injury - I know how hard they can be to deal with, and I wish you a speedy return to health and confidence in your brain’s abilities.

      • Maeve@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        Thank you so very much for your kindness and well wishes. I’m confident in plasticity and compensation. I just need to get serious about training, and I’m quite a bit more fortunate than others who have been much more affected with similar or worse injuries. I survived and am relatively thriving, and I’m so grateful for that.
        It’s just embarrassing, between that and autocorrect, and it’s made me check and recheck my words, since gaslighting is abundant, IRL and online.

        • livus@kbin.socialOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          8 months ago

          Glad to know you’re receiving support and have a good prognosis.

          I didn’t think about the gaslighting aspect. Silver lining: there are plenty of confidently incorrect people online too, so if you make the occasional blunder nobody will bat an eye!

          • Maeve@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            8 months ago

            Literally laughed aloud at the last sentence. Thanks so much for that! There are plenty of confidently incorrect critics, of so many! I think most of us seem to be our own worst critics, I’m just neither confident whether in correct or incorrect; and maybe that’s not a bad way to be.

            • livus@kbin.socialOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              8 months ago

              I think it’s not a bad way to be; you’re probably in better company!

              Betrand Russell complained that “the fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves, and wiser people so full of doubts,” but Dunning Kruger syndrome makes me think that having doubt is not necessarily as bad as it sounds.

              • Maeve@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                8 months ago

                Thank you. It’s so odd when “joke theories” like Dunning Kruger and quantum physics pan out. Wonder if the Drake equation will yield hard evidence, in our lifetimes? I realize the numbers are estimates, but it is very tasty mind candy, for me (I still don’t think public congressional hearings held in the USA were a good use of the public’s time and money, though, nor Cingress’ either). Entertaining but there’s other ways to have better spent irretrievable resources.

                • livus@kbin.socialOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  @Maeve that is an intriguing one. I’d forgotten about the Drake equation. Our lives are changing so fast it seems possible.

                  I find myself sort of torn when it comes to space (and art). On one hand I find the resources spent on it really questionable when there’s so much in the world we still need resources for. And then on the other hand my mind … wants to have nice things to contemplate!

                  • Maeve@kbin.social
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    8 months ago

                    Art and science are necessities and we have the resources to afford both, but for the ultragreedy. Was it Ghandj or Krishnamurti who said, “when the whole world understands enough is enough, the whine world will have enough”? Maybe neither. And someone else said we should always let our reach exceed our grasp. Our litter reaches the stars, no reason we shouldn’t. I don’t think Vorgol* is interested in cleaning it up, and it’s our mess, so we should clean it. Yeah, I’m a dreamer.

                    *Twice I saw Google autocorrect correct this, and corrected it back a third time. TIL Google autocorrect is worse than iOS.