You must log in or # to comment.
Por que no los dos?
Hooray! 🌮
It’s strangely satisfying when the “this will probably never happen” test case finds a problem during development.
I had tests for deleting that were like
- create item a
- create item b
- delete item a via the code under test
- assert item a is gone
- assert item b is still there
I thought maybe the whole bit with item b was excessive, but sure enough one day I accidentally fucked something up and deleted all the items, and the test pointed it out before the bad code left my local machine.
the autistic overthinking the unit tests
overthinked squared
what if someone tries to input a cat to this function?
Z – Zero O – One M – Many (or More complex) B – Boundary Behaviors I – Interface definition E – Exercise Exceptional behavior S – Simple Scenarios, Simple SolutionsUse triple backticks instead of one if you are trying to get monospace syntax
Bless. Also please dont peel my face off for that mistake :p
Sorry, the face scalpers are already on their way. Nothing we can do
Nah just informed you lol
Autist 🙂↔️
Autest 🙂↕️
Ok, well, if you ever come across a test framework named AuTest, you can blame me, because I’m stealing the shit out of that.
Think of it as a function you can unleash on others…
Third arm: Every fucking human
Sick and tired of autism gang ™ laying claim to totally normal human behavior just because they have a mental developmental disfigurement.
too bad, being sick and tired belongs to us now, go feel something else allist 😎
