• Quetzalcutlass@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      At least they all appear to be cosmetics like furniture, outfits, and skins for pets. Judging by the DLC descriptions I don’t see any gameplay locked behind paywalls.

      Agreed that those prices are absurd though.

      • kyle@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        6 months ago

        If it matters they’re all skins that don’t really matter, purely cosmetic. I bought and played the game, on year 2.

        If you’re opposed on principle, I get it, but IMHO extra cosmetic packs aren’t predatory. What you get for your money is clear (unlike loot boxes) and you aren’t paywalled behind new content (so no FOMO).

        • CALIGVLA@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 months ago

          Eh, I dunno man, it kind of leaves a bad taste in my mouth to support games with tons of DLC even if just cosmetic, the game has to be really good to compensate and even then I’m not a fan of it. I miss the times when cosmetics like this would be locked behind an in-game challenge or achievement.

          • kyle@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            Yeah that’s fair.

            It feels bad to see this giant wall of DLCs, just feels like a cash grab. I appreciate the transparency anyway, and I don’t have to participate to enjoy it.