It's been far too long since I've made time to sit down and write. I recently went through the ritual of swapping phones, so I will use the opportunity to jot some notes down. I keep separate devices for work and personal usage. For the last several years, my personal
  • Nima@leminal.spaceEnglish
    32·
    6 months ago

    “securing a Google Pixel Phone” would be a more appropriate headline.

    anyone without a pixel, this guide will do nothing for you.

        • jet@hackertalks.comEnglish
          62·
          5 months ago

          https://grapheneos.org/faq#future-devices

          Hardware, firmware and software specific to devices like drivers play a huge role in the overall security of a device. The goal of the project is not to slightly improve some aspects of insecure devices and supporting a broad set of devices would be directly counter to the values of the project. A lot of the low-level work also ends up being fairly tied to the hardware.

          TLDR - Google open bootloader, able to relock the bootloader with custom keys, AOSP, hardware binaries freely accessible, as well as the hardware security features on pixel phones.

          Selected Items

          • Support for using alternate operating systems including full hardware security functionality

          • Complete monthly Android Security Bulletin patches without any regular delays longer than a week

          • Vendor code updated to new monthly, quarterly and yearly releases of AOSP within several months to provide new security improvements (Pixels receive these in the month they’re released)

          • Isolated radios (cellular, Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, NFC, etc.), GPU, SSD, media encode / decode, image processor and other components

          …

          Is google pixel the only group capable of making a secure phone? No, anyone could do it, but only google pixel IS doing it.

  • d3lta19@lemmy.ca
    14·
    6 months ago

    Great article. I think graphene OS is irreplaceable in my life at this point.