It’s unbelievable how vocal the minority of conservatives on reddit have suddenly gotten in the one sub where a large demographic of important voters often interact. Hmmm. Coincidence?

  • DandomRude@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    62
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    They even try to do this on Lemmy. I’ve seen a few accounts recently that were obviously created with the sole purpose of spreading right-wing propaganda.

    • archomrade [he/him]@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      4 months ago

      As someone who is routinely accused of being a bad actor, I have to say I find this speculation to be somewhat paranoid.

      I think people generally overestimate the commonality of their own perspective.

      • DandomRude@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        4 months ago

        I’m sorry you’ve had a bad experience. Nevertheless, I think that a certain basic skepticism is important in social media, because it is simply a fact that many interest groups on the internet are fighting for sovereignty of interpretation and use enormous resources to assert themselves - even with very questionable methods. This of course makes it difficult to build trust and have an open discourse. The advantage of Lemmy, however, is that at least the platform itself does not interfere too much, like Meta, X or TikTok do. Therefore, it seems to me that there is a much higher probability that you will be heard with your opinion, message or whatever, if you can provide good arguments for your point of view. Sure, there are some viewpoints that users reject despite good arguments, but from my Lemmy experience so far, that seems to me to be the exception rather than the rule.

      • MrPoopbutt@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        There are several things that lots of bad actors and bots say frequently enough that if someone says it, it may be faster to assume paid shill than to take the extra time to vet someone or give their opinion real thought.

        This extends to more than just politics.

    • pelotron@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      4 months ago

      There are still plenty of people that have gone so far left that they crossed the prime meridian and landed on the right.

        • pelotron@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          I could rephrase and say their beliefs are not the same, but their behaviors are. Think of some of the worst qualities of far right posting. Memes that pigeonhole non-believers, co-opting language to mean things other than what the majority of people understand it to mean, facts-optional diatribes. Now read any number of Hexbear threads.

          • jorp@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            equality extremists wanting an egalitarian society are not just as bad as fascists and theocrats even if they both have bad memes …

      • sunzu@kbin.run
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        4 months ago

        I bet because they only post on thing topic with some random sprinckled in for cred.

        But it would be interesting to hear from the commenter above.

        Operatives appear for a shill campaign out of no where and once it is over they will generally disappear. They work in groups.

        • DandomRude@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          4 months ago

          Exactly. I mean accounts that are typically not very old and exclusively spread right-wing content and the corresponding ideas - apart from perhaps a few low effort comments or posts that are most likely intended to conceal this fact. What makes these accounts even more suspicious to me is that they generally do not put forward any factual arguments, are not impressed by them in any way and are not even interested in a discussion. If you confront them and they respond at all, they always lapse into whataboutism or fall back on the familiar “I’m just asking questions” - both are strategies that think tanks in particular use to deflect attention from the fact that their claims and accusations have no factual basis. I can only conclude from such behavior that it is not about exchanging ideas with others, but about promoting a clearly defined world view, creating discord and aggression, tying up resources or forming a nucleus for belief in irrational assertions. I don’t think private individuals without a political agenda would do that - at least not to this extent.

          • MarciaLynnDorsett@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            4 months ago

            I don’t think private individuals without a political agenda

            i don’t believe there are private individuals without a political agenda

          • MarciaLynnDorsett@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            4 months ago

            I can only conclude from such behavior that it is not about exchanging ideas with others, but about promoting a clearly defined world view,

            some people want to spread their ideas. that doesn’t make them not-people or even require that tehy are paid.

            • DandomRude@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              4 months ago

              Is your argument that it’s okay to spread hate and slander without providing any evidence as long as people aren’t getting paid? Also, what makes you so sure that these are private accounts?

          • sunzu@kbin.run
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            4 months ago

            It ain’t just far right…

            DNC coup of biden attract a lot of these operatives too recently

            Politics and news subs are ran by these people. Can’t tell if they are reporters or straight up DNC shills though

            We’ll also got corpo shill campaigns happening too although that’s Reddit’s bread and butter now

            • DandomRude@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              4 months ago

              It is certainly true that other interest groups also engage in propaganda (or PR, as it is called these days) in both traditional and social media. But that’s not what this thread is about.

              Anyway, you can perhaps even see something positive in the fact that the usual PR and opinion manipulation methods are now apparently also being applied to Lemmy, because this shows that whoever is responsible for these campaigns obviously ascribes a certain importance to this platform and thus also to the Fediverse - and that is somewhat of a good thing, I guess.

              • sunzu@kbin.run
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                4 months ago

                Yeah I was surprised to notice these patterns here this early

                I am assuming they are taking seriously and learn to to use the platform.

                It is also easier to notice due to way less volume here.

                I just hope with proepr education people can better avoid feeding it.

                Spotting Bad faith actor V disliking opinion is not quite a wide spread skill. But people are getting better at it.

                Remember folks, just because you like what they say, doesn’t make them a good faith actor. And reverse

      • Mechaguana@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        4 months ago

        Because they dont interact with anyone except to spread hateful messages, and the messages are copy pastes of other bots.

        Right wing ideology is maintained from the top. It HAS to astroturf itself if there arent enough sycophants.

        • MarciaLynnDorsett@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          4 months ago

          they dont interact with anyone except to spread hateful messages, and the messages are copy pastes of other bots.

          i have never seen this.

        • MarciaLynnDorsett@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 months ago

          this is a platform for people to discuss topics that interest them. i have every reason to believe it’s populated by people discussing topics that interest them.