Hi! I remember there beings talks about beehaw planning to eventually move to a lemmy alternative with proper moderation tools, and was interested in following the development of this alternative, but I’ve forgotten the name of the project and can’t find the specific posts about the subject. Anyone remember what I’m talking about?

  • pr06lefs@lemmy.ml
    12·
    4 months ago

    What I think would be interesting would be a link aggregator based around tags rather than subcommunities. Moderation would be based around these tags. Your feed would be based on tag queries. Posts could have multiple tags, assigned by the original poster or by users. Assigning tags would have a similar effect to voting, so a post might get tagged by 1000 people as ‘corporate lies’, or as ‘music’, or whatever else.

    Nice thing about this would be finer grained queries with news, for instance. Could get ‘politics’, but minus ‘corporate lies’.

    • CaptObvious@literature.cafe
      5·
      4 months ago

      This is a really cool idea, and some fediverse software already lets you follow hashtags (ie Pixelfed and maybe Mastodon). I could imagine this being immediately abused by mistagging to force material into your feed. It’s already a problem on Pixelfed.

    • 7EP6vuI@feddit.orgEnglish
      2·
      4 months ago

      i think you mix two concepts here:

      the first is basically that you can post to multiple communities at once (community = tag)

      the second is that users can assign tags/communities to existing posts, and vote for them

      i like both and already thought about the first one, but not the second one… I first thought it might be a problem that if you add a community/tag to an existing post it will be immediately visible on said community/tag, but if this is a problem for said community, someone could down-vote there and it would vanish. but then you would need two up votes: one for community fit, and one for the post itself. could be a problem, if you post one link to a very popular community and a very small one, then the post would get many upvotes and be on the top of the small one…

      • pr06lefs@lemmy.ml
        2·
        4 months ago

        I’d leave the sorting up to the users. So for a post where 5 users tagged it as ‘baroque music’, and 5000 tagged it as ‘boring’, one could sort the feed by ‘total tags’ on a post indicating general interest (5005), or just ‘total tags I follow’ which might just be ‘baroque music’ (5). Or maybe reverse sort by tags so ‘boring’ stuff is towards the bottom.

        I’d think that ignoring tags would be a thing for users, so “libtards” or whatever could be ignored.

        Tag mods could ban problematic users, so someone could get banned for tagging ‘corporate lies’ where the mods think it doesn’t belong. Offenders could make their own ‘corporate liez’ tag though, I suppose.

        A tag hierarchy might be desirable, like everything tagged ‘baroque’ also getting ‘music’ automatically. Perhaps through agreements with the mods of each tag.

        ‘archive of our own’ I’ve heard has a solid system of tag moderation. Not sure it would be appropriate for a system like this.

    • fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.comEnglish
      1·
      4 months ago

      I like the community method, because admins are going to want to own something more tangible. However, would love to see Lemmy implement user tagging on top of it.

  • mozz@mbin.grits.dev
    7·
    4 months ago

    I thought it was confirmed to be Piefed once that is complete enough to be useful. Idk, though, maybe that is me just imagining things.

    Edit: I am imagining things, it is Sublinks

  • bluGill@kbin.run
    6·
    4 months ago

    kbin/mbin is another alternative. I have no idea how the moderation tools are, but it is open source.