Easily install your favourite browsers on Fedora Atomic Desktops, Silverblue, Kinoite, uBlue, Bazzite, Aurora, Bluefin, Secureblue etc.

  • Lemongrab@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    12 days ago

    Is there any good reason to use Vivaldi? Nice to see more scripts from you. I have been thinking about making some scripts to automate the deployment of Bubblejail profiles for different apps. I don’t run nearly anything without sandboxing, and Bubblejail does not interfer with the Chromium sandbox.

    • dev_null@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      10 days ago

      I use it for a few years now, it’s very customizable. In my opinion the best Chromium-based browser. I recommend either Vivaldi or Firefox depending on your needs.

      • Lemongrab@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 days ago

        I would never use Vivaldi just because it is closed source, doesnt add proper fingerprinting protections, and does not provide a secure default config. Cromite and Brave are better options (for me).

        • dev_null@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          10 days ago

          I’ve never heard of Cromite so don’t have an opinion, but Brave is super shady, with crypto-shilling, ad-injecting, adding tracking codes to clicked URLs that didn’t have them, something so privacy ruining you’d be better of using Chrome. They can’t be trusted, and I’m not even getting to the CEO being a questionable figure. Nobody should use it, let alone anyone caring about privacy. People prioritizing privacy should be using Firefox or Vivaldi, both privacy focused browsers.

          Vivaldi is not closed source. It’s not open source either (they don’t accept PRs), but the source is available.

          • Lemongrab@lemmy.one
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            10 days ago

            Vivaldi is closed source, they say so on their website. I don’t like the CEO of Brave, neither do I like the crypto nonesense, but arguing that Vivaldi is better for privacy (let alone vanilla chrome) is incredibly incorrect. Brave actually does a decent job of anti-fingerprinting and has strong site isolation. I prefer Cromite because it isnt associated with Brave or any crypto.

            Browser comparison table by the developer of DivestOS: https://divestos.org/pages/browsers

            • dev_null@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              9 days ago

              I don’t dispute Brave may be private in the current version, but with all the things they did they are not trustworthy, with many write ups online, some going as far as to call it malware. You are of course free to disagree, if you don’t think your browser adding extra tracking to your links is a deal breaker.

              I don’t know where you are reading that Vivaldi is closed source. The source code is right here: https://vivaldi.com/source/

              It does have fingerprinting protection, it has blocking trackers and ads built-in, and you can enable site isolation and turn off third party cookies if you choose to.

              • Lemongrab@lemmy.one
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                9 days ago

                Brave added affiliate links to URLs. While I agree this is quite shady, it is not much different from how Vivaldi makes money. Also Vivaldi is not open source and doesnt come close to Brave or Librewolf in privacy tests. Vivaldi’s fingerprinting protections are incomplete (it seems they stopped at canvas randomization?), it features a weak built-in content blocker, and has an insecure default config (JS JIT and WASM are enabled). I would compare it to default ungoogled chromium + basic adblocker. Vivaldi is no where close to Librewolf or Brave in terms of adblocking, anti-fingerprinting, and browser security hardening. Vivaldi is a neat browser, but a privacy one? I don’t think so.

                EDIT: Here are some links. Privacytests.org is a precomputed comparison table, the other two sites are fingerprinting sites which give a better idea of how much must be protected for adequate anti-fingerprinting.

                Independent browser Privacy tests: https://privacytests.org/
                CreepJS fingerprinting site: https://abrahamjuliot.github.io/creepjs/
                Firefox Arkenfox fingerprinting test site: https://arkenfox.github.io/TZP/tzp.html

                • dev_null@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  9 days ago

                  I said Vivaldi is not open source a 2 comments ago. I said I recommend Firefox and derivatives, including Librewolf, I said Brave may be more secure, but shouldn’t be used for reason that have nothing to do with it. Since you are not reading my comments anyway, I won’t spend the time.

    • boredsquirrel@slrpnk.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      12 days ago

      I dont use Vivaldi haha, but their installation is so weird that I wanted to fix that.

      I use Firefox and since bubblejail has support for firefoxes name on Fedora (bubblejail is strange) I tried it and got memory issues or something, pretty crazy.

      I think vivaldi is just as fine as regular Chromium, probably slower patches. A debloated Brave will be better for privacy.