• Red_October@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    4 days ago

    A big part of the problem hasn’t been the engine. The problem has been that games that made the fact that they were using Unreal Engine 5 a core part of their marketing did so because they had fuckall else worth saying, tying perception of the engine to a bunch of truly mid games.

    • steeznson@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      21 hours ago

      The engine itself is clearly optimised to build fortnite and everything else needs to bend it to suit any other style of game.

  • ThunderComplex@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    4 days ago

    I think the biggest issue this engine has is just how many features there are. There are probably at least four ways to get any given job done, and sometimes there isn’t even a clear best option. I have lots of gripes with the engine but they can be summarized as “it’s just too big” No wonder games aren’t properly optimized when UE tries to replace a dozen established tools.

  • ZephyrXero@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 days ago

    If it’s running 5.0-5.2, you should be worried. And most all games released to date are from this range. Devs could upgrade to 5.3+, the one they finally optimized it on. it’s not all on Epic

    • lustyargonian@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      I wonder if we’ll see remasters or definitive editions in coming years for games released with older versions. Nanite foliage might be a lot of work I guess.

  • kaffiene@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    4 days ago

    Um. BS. I have a 1080 and Remnant 2 plays fantastic on my machine. It’s not UE5 which is the problem

    • Björn Tantau@swg-empire.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      4 days ago

      Or Hellblade 2. It looks and runs phenomenally on the Steam Deck. And I’ve never seen a modern game with loading times so short.

    • Skipcast@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      Ironically remnant 2 runs like ass, for me anyway. 2k 16:9 resolution with a 3090 and modern ryzen cpu (forgot which one exactly atm but it cost a lot lmao)

  • Viri4thus@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    4 days ago

    It’s not UE5, it’s the nvidia partnership. Every time NVIDIA engineers touch a game, the end result runs like absolute garbage. Stalker is just the latest example! The main issue of UE5 is the shader compilation.

    • Murvel@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      The main issue of UE5 is the shader compilation.

      It isn’t! Where did you get that from?!

      Digital Foundry recently did a tech review of Stalker 2 showing the game is heavily CPU-limited…

        • Murvel@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 days ago

          But shader compilation issues are still not inherently a UE5 problem.

          Traversal stutters however is, as it has been demonstrated that there is something seriously wrong with how the engine syncs its supporting functions (like animation and world transition)

            • Murvel@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              4 days ago

              The traversal stutters occur regardless of what kind of rig you got. You can run Silent Hill on a monster machine and it will still stutter, at least as it is currently late 2024.