• Vegoon@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    1 year ago

    Don’t just wait passively for it, take action. Everyone can contribute and together we will achieve big things. If we all work together the collapse is not just a dream.

    • MBM@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      1 year ago

      … did everyone misread your comment or am I crazy? I have faith that we can make horrible climate change a reality if we just put our minds to it.

    • Lt_Cdr_Data@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      Dont use plastic straws, drive public transport or bike, buy bio food, donate to orgs, glue yourself to the street

      and maybe… just maybe… you will change fuck all

      • MuffinX@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Plastic straws have almost zero to none impact on climate change. It is one of the biggest virtue signaling campaings that managed to scam shit ton of gullible people. Climate change is a never ending process, those who can alter the process have way bigger means to affect it than you and me. Regulate the companies, end the “too big to fail” market monopoly, tax the shit out of billioners. Dont fall to their diversion strategy that we are to blame for any of this shit.

          • Krauerking@lemy.lol
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            And they still eat floating plastic that they mistake for jellyfish.

            No the straw thing was about a cute kid making a science fair project about “The Dangers of Straws!” With all the thought an elementary school student could offer to the conversation that was latched onto by the media to fill a time slot and get more media buzz.

        • Blackmist@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Not only did it do fuck all to help, it was also really annoying.

          Likely on purpose to make people not want to help the environment at all if it means having soggy paper in your drinks.

          The paper straws couldn’t even be recycled.

      • Sotuanduso@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Burn a barrel of oil in your backyard. Run the AC with the doors and windows open. Buy a heavy truck and take a cross-country joyride.

        Before you downvote me, reread the comment two back in this chain.

      • Duamerthrax@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Buy less, travel less, demand wfh.

        No political will promote slowing the economy down even though that’s the simplest, most straightforward way to slow our pollution output. Our stockmarket and retirement plans are based on infinite growth, which is unfeasible even without climate change being a factor.

    • electriccars@startrek.websiteOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      If we all work together the collapse is not just a dream.

      Hoping to speed up the collapse I see lol.

      I drive a hybrid.

      I recycle everything I can.

      I pickup litter.

      I try to be as power efficient as possible.

      I’m not a vegetarian but I don’t eat meat everyday.

      Plus, I post memes that stimulate conversation like this!

      • Vegoon@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I am vegan since 5 years, before I was (don’t judge me, or do- its deserved) 10 years vegetarian. Since ~15 years? PV on my roof which feed into the grid many times more power than I used I rarely travel, not one flight. I advocate and work towards a sustainable future. Demonstrations and some political work. Go on, check my my posts and judge for yourself if I was maybe sarcastic?

        • NaoPb@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          What I notice is a lot of petrochemical companies, conglomerates, politicians and attorneys. And Facebook.Our best bet would be to steer clear of those, or at least as much as possible.

          I have personally switched to a cleaner car (no electric since I cannot yet afford them), walk and cycle more often, no longer buy Unilever or Nestle products (though that’s more of a moral reason) and am even stricter with my energy consumption. I try to use most of my belongings as long as possible (unless they consume a lot of power) and try to repair everything until it is so broken and worn out that I have to replace it. Which I will replace it with something of a good quality that will last many years and preferably made locally, always trying to prevent buying from Chinese companies. My landlord (it’s a company but I can’t think of the word for it) has installed solar panels on my home 4 years ago and I am using LED lights and have replaced all CRT tv’s/monitors with LCD. Built newer computers with lower energy CPU’s. Lights that are frequently used have been put on a timer or sensor so they are automatically switched off. Other lights are turned off when leaving the room. I have switched to an electrical stove to prevent the need for fracking gas and earthquakes caused by natural gas pumping. Oh and my gardens mostly consist of grass and plants.

          I think that’s about it.

      • beteljuice@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Went vegan. Got 35 solar cells. Replaced lawn with native plants. Work from home. Spending a lot of time advocating online and to friends and family. Raising kids as environmentalists.

        • SolarNialamide@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          And you and kids are still gonna die from the effects of climate change and the collapse of society because a handful of billionaires and corporations only care about making more money next quarter in spite of every single other human being on the planet.

      • Vegoon@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Going vegan is according to the IPCC the single biggest step a individual can take. This does not take anything away from other actions we can simultaneous pursue. Veganism is growing and has despite being a small percentage of the population the potential for a change.

        • Sotuanduso@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          And it’d probably be a lot more convincing if my experience with vegans outside the past year or so weren’t composed entirely of people pushing it on the basis of “killing animals is wrong.”

          • Vegoon@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Its a multitude of reasons for people to go vegan: The animals, their own health, the probability of not creating a living hell on earth. The reason why vegans try to convince others is often because after a few years most are so disconnected from the killing of others for taste where it is a giant argument. The suffering and abuse of 90 billion sentient land animals per year alone is for most good enough to stop supporting it. I have surrendered that argument for most discussions because it is hard to have that empathy while it is a part in your live. It wasn’t for me, although is was not challenged in that view back then. So now my arguments moved more towards egoism which sometimes works.

  • Computerchairgeneral@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    Yeah. At least when nuclear war was the existential threat hanging over humanity you had the comfort that it would all be over in an instant. Now we get to watch a slow unraveling of civilization over decades while things continue to get worse. Fun times.

  • Gnubyte@lemdit.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m thinking of moving to a state that’s colder where I can buy land that has water within the property.

    I also think to do anything sizeable you need the resources a company can bring. Our problems are at scale. You need a scaled resource pool and reinvestment in that to work up to some of the issues. I like the idea of carbon extraction for example, but I don’t see any resources invested in it from US companies.

    • Sotuanduso@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Carbon extraction isn’t a viable solution until its whole area is running on green energy. With current technology, at least, running it on a green power source will make less of an impact than hooking that green power source up to replace some fossil fuels.

      In other words, don’t rely on heal spells until the battle’s over. They’ll never outpace incoming damage.

      • Duamerthrax@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Also, as far as resource costs go, planting tree is more efficient at capturing carbon then any industrial scrubber. Research should still be done, but anyone trying to sell a scrubber plant is just fishing for VC funds.

  • BudgetBandit@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Slowly…

    In human time, yes. In world time, no.

    The problem IMHO is that the ”information“ feels like propaganda. “You need to stop doing this, because the planet needs you to“ I mean come on, 80% of all the greenhouse gas emissions come from 10 companies.

    Don’t FridayForFuture us, FridayForFuture them.

    Oh, and one thing to add to trigger a whole lot of people: Most of the people are dependent on those companies, because they earn too little to get an alternative. And saying they are the reason is like telling a POW that their crafting of shells kills Americans.

    • vivadanang@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Car dealerships in the US are whining that they can’t move the expensive EV’s car makers are producing. Meanwhile the world is burning. We need a crash program to replace every damned gas powered vehicle needed, while eliminating hundreds of thousands completely off the road where possible. Cities should have sidewalks, bikepaths, and mass rail transit everywhere in the US.

      If we don’t do it, we’re pissing in the wind.

      edit: same with renewable generation - no more nimby bullshit. build it all. no one’s view is worth another summer like this.

  • ThePac@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    You people think it will be a night and day collapse? Get real. The rich will continue to get richer and you’ll toil away in relative comfort as you do now.

      • SolarNialamide@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Even if your particular house is in a safe location, you’re still fucked from all the other houses being flooded and burned down because that means disastrous effects on global supply chains including food and a massive refugee crisis the likes of which the world has literally never seen.

    • Muehe@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      You people think it will be a night and day collapse? Get real.

      You know that’s the thing, nobody really knows. It’s all predictions based on necessarily flawed models. And they range from relatively mild changes until the turn of the century on the one hand, over methane released from thawing permafrost leading to a steep acceleration of warming in the middle, to having crossed an irreversible tipping point decades ago that will lead to an algae bloom in the oceans which will render the atmosphere unbreathable on the other hand. We can only hope it’s on the former end of the spectrum, but I wouldn’t bet on it personally.

        • RegularGoose@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          We can’rt do shit. The only things rhat could potentially have any meaningful impact are government regulation or the killing of CEOs and big investors en masse, and neither one is going to happen.

          • Muehe@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            Well not with that attitude. Defeatisms doesn’t become you my friend.

            • RegularGoose@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Unless you expect people to start murdering oil executives and climate denier politicians, you’re wrong. Teslas and paper staws are never going to make a difference, because consumer-level pollution isn’t the problem.

              What reason is there not to be defeatist? We already fucking lost decades ago.

              • Muehe@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                Well the problem with defeatism is that it’s a self-fullfilling prophecy. If you believe everything is lost you will not try to enact change.

                Now I acknowledged already that it might well be too late, but I also maintain that there isn’t enough certainty in that prediction to base your actions around it.

                So the reason to not be defeatist is twofold. There might be a chance to reverse or at least lessen the impact of climate change, and by being defeatist you are robbing yourself and future generations off that chance.

  • Haui@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    The interesting part are those who still don’t write letters to their congressmen and still vote for climate deniers. I just can’t.

    It would be insanely easy to solve: Not one of the billionaires out there would recognize if they only had 999 mil left and neither would anybody else. That‘s a cool 10 trillion to pay towards climate change. You‘re welcome.

    That money was earned using earth, so to saving earth it goes back (because no earth, no money and our billionaire overlords suprisingly havent saved us yet.)

    • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Though I agree with you on taking money from the rich people, that’s mostly not how it works. Most rich persons has most of his “worth” in stocks. Even scammer musk’s worth mostly is “worth” because of his ownership of Tesla and the such. He doesn’t actually have that money.

      Most importantly: It’s not insanely easy to solve, Sven if you pump in trillions. Even if we stop pumping carbon in the air tomorrow it will still take centuries until the atmosphere is back to normal, barring any carbon capture.

      The problem with is that the extra CO2 in the air comes from energy we took from burning fossil fuels. If we want to capture it back, we need to spend the same mount of energy that the world spent for the past, say, 2 centuries, from non carbon sources to get that done. This energy does not include the energy that the world needs to function.

      That is an insane amount of energy that, again, has to come from non carbon emitting sources.

      Also, until all energy comes from non carbon emitting sources, carbon capture is useless because if both you’ll spent 100 carbon for each, say, 50-70 (optimistically) carbon you capture.

      If I say “Were not even close to 100% non carbon emissions in energy creation” it’s a huge understatement. I believe something around 10% of our energy production is non carbon emitting. Cars are not included.

      Making all out cars electrical is also cute. It’s a nice thought if it weren’t that all that electricity still mostly comes from CO2 emitting sources so including conversion losses electrical cars may actually send more CO2 in the atmosphere.

      You want to actually solve this?

      Make ALL our electrical generation non CO2 emitting in the next 10 years. Air and solar are cute, but fractional and will remain that, probably for ever. We need nuclear power plants like there is no tomorrow in all countries, even the “bad” ones.

      This obviously isn’t going to happen.

      We will likely end up with some form of atmospheric engineering where we’re going to meas with the atmosphere, seeding clouds, or pumping other chemicals in there that negate the effects of CO2. I’m unsure what the results of that will be though

      Either way, you and I will NOT see the end of this, that is for our children’s children

      • Haui@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        That’s a disturbing but interesting take. Thank you very much.

        The funny thing is that you can sell stocks. I know that a billionaire does not have dagoberts vault at home (maybe some do).

        But their net worth is calculated somehow and in selling all assets above 999 mil, you get exactly what I‘m talking about.

        I get that this is a long undertaking but we are still on the way up. This needs to stop now so we do it now. Use the money to stop the gravest polluters first and by the time you run out of money, you‘re a lot better on the scale.

        Btw the estimated cost to 2030 to stop climate change is 90 trillion. So this does part of it.

        Just wanted to put that out there. It’s surely gonna be a big job since most of us lack vision.

        Not like we could start working only on that since we need to make stuff nobody needs to impress people we dont like./s

        Also, my personal favorite in idiotic ideas is telling citizens to just not buy and suv. Just outlaw the production you maggots! We saw with covid how well voluntary behavior helped.

        Yes, I blame governments for not doing what needs to be done to save the fucking planet. A mass of humans is easy to manipulate if you’re rich and can not be given this much responsibility. We elect people for this.

        • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Once a major stock holder starts selling his stock like crazy, that stock will nosedive. See Elon “I’ll be the last one to sell tesla stock!” Musk dumping tesla stock and check it’s current value.

          And governments should not ask not to buy SUV’s, they should ban SUV’s. Yes, ban. They are horrible for the environment, horrible for safety of the driver, horrible for the safety of others, horrible in every aspect and they only exist because car manufacturers want to sell more so they told people they look cool.

          Start taxing the crap out of cars, all short distance travel (< 5 - 10 kms) should be by bike, with Electrical the engine support in mountainous areas.we use 2 tonnes of steel and plastics to mostly move single 50-100 kgs persons around. That. Is. Insane. It’s unsustainable. Redesign American cities (American being the continent here, not just the country) to no long have these horrible suburbs, make all cities human Centric, not car centric. People should be able to walk to 50% of local stores and cycle to 95% of stores. It makes for wonderful safe cities to live in (see every single city, tiny and large in the Netherlands), makes people healthier due to more exercise, makes healthier air (no car pollution) bad lowers CO2 output by a literal fucktonne.

          This would make everything better, which is why it not only will never happen, politicians will beber talk about it because big oil, big car and big whatever the fuck need more bigger cars polluting more because WE WANT MONEY AND POWER.

          The world is fucked, sorry.

            • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              How else? How about not? You simply don’t because you can’t. Barring some weird exceptions, no country will be able to be carbon neutral in 10 years, let alone the entire world.

              Yes we need to do loads of work, and yes, nuclear will form a huge part because we don’t have another choice. Nuclear will cause CO2 too, yes, during building mostly and nothing near what coal or similar plants do.

              I’m simply saying we can (and must) do nuclear next to solar and wind.

              Either way it doesn’t matter since entieht you nor I make those decisions and those that do mostly don’t give a shit as long as they get their paycheck

              Edit: you want to make a real change?

              Increase taxes on carbon fuels significantly every year. Prohibit the construction and sale of useless throwaway products like fashion that lasts 3 wears until it breaks, phones that will work for only 1-2 years. Invest heavily in improving recycling so that we can recycle everything. Invest in alternative nuclear fuels like thorium so that more countries can go nuclear without having to worry about bombs. Stop the "delivery in one day! " economy, which basically requires alAmazon to be destroyed . Redesign American continent cities completely to no longer be car dependent so that people can walk and cycle for 95% of their needs and use public transportation or shared cars for the rest.

              Those are some insane but required solutions if we want to stop climate change.

              Car dependent cities are unsustainable, financially and environmentally. Our throwaway economy is unsustainable. Our dependency on fossil fuels in unsustainable

      • JustLookingForDigg@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m surprised this got so many upvotes, a lot of it is factually incorrect! For instance many grids worldwide are over 50% renewables. You can scrub carbon with a net carbon loss if you use solar powered to do it.

        There’s also no reason that capturing the carbon would cost all the energy that was released by burning it (you don’t have to make it into the same fuel molecule).

        Honestly this sounds like climate change denier shit, “it’s too late there’s nothing we can do, buy more oil.”.

        On the positive side, I agree that nuclear is great!

  • ganymede@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    expect they’ve found a way to ‘profit’ off the collapse already. might be one of the reasons they’re doing nothing to stop it

    • crispy_kilt@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      And when the last land is a desert, the last river dry, the last field poisoned, the last tree cut down, will they realise that one cannot eat money.

  • LillyPip@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Okay, jokes aside, how do I convince my dad?

    He’s Silent Generation (86), and he’s very smart and savvy otherwise (he’s an aerospace engineer, still has his 9-5 job in airplane development and has recently started driving for Uber to fill his spare time), and plays VR games on Oculus with me and my sister on weekends, but he doesn’t have patience for our climate change talk. He’s extremely liberal otherwise, but he thinks this is all overblown and the natural cycle of climate, telling us he’s seen these changes before.

    How do I convince him this is different? Im at a loss. Or maybe I shouldn’t bother because at his age it doesn’t matter and I should just let him ‘be right’?

    My sister is disturbed by his attitude, but im not sure it matters, really.

  • Decompose@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Just remember in 20 years when nothing changes and life proceeds as normal. No one will care what you think then because the robbery will have been done.