yes in the wired article one of them says they would like to find out where it got stuck taking an hour with an agent replay feature

for coding you want to use claude

if you don’t want to pay for claude after so many messages what you can do is use mistral to code it up then use claude to proof check the code

If they divorce, they have to split their possessions

Better murder another human being then?! That’s a foolproof plan

To me just easier to walk away with half than literally murder someone

I don’t think I’ll ever get it

I don’t want to spend an hour on tasks that would normally take 10 minutes.

I don’t get it, do you think she spent an hour talking to ChatGPT to try and get it to order doughnuts?

i’ll never understand what is going through these guys minds when they can just get up and leave

it makes no sense to me

I saw recently they are preparing for this

https://lmstudio.ai/blog/free-for-work

Commercial Plans

LM Studio is a conduit for open source models and AI software. It’s meant to be the first place you go to try new models, and a place where you can do professional grade work over months and years. In addition to the app, we’re also shipping the LM Studio SDK and recently the Hub. The LM Studio Hub is where you can share your LM Studio “stuff”: things you create within the app or with the SDK.

Putting all these things together, companies often have a need for fine-grained control over the models (and recently MCPs) their users can run, or require access control capabilities for various artifacts (presets, configurations, etc.) shared within the team.

Later this week, we will introduce a way to create a public Hub organization for your team, and use it with LM Studio at work (or school, or anywhere) for free. For companies that require more advanced features like SSO, model / MCP gating, and private collaboration: we are offering an Enterprise plan. A growing list of Fortune 500 companies, universities, and global organizations are already using LM Studio for Enterprise. If this sounds like something you need, contact us to get started.

In line with reducing friction for using LM Studio at work, we will also be introducing a simple self-serve Teams plan later this month that enables sharing various artifacts privately within your team. Sign up to be notified when it becomes available.

Then why are you defending it?

I’m not defending it, you were just way off base about it and then decided to double down, who’s the AI now? 😉

ChatGPT steals many of the features from other LLM’s and websites, bit like how Microsoft and Apple and Linux all copy and steal from each other

Yes, the summary is right

Great! Turns out AI doesn’t hallucinate everything, it might actually be useful! 🤣

And if that’s the case then you need not worry! If you are worried about the accuracy of a statement you can click on the links provided.

This allows you to do 2 things:

1. on things you are looking for an approximation of you get immediate results (Benefit of using AI)
2. if you would like to look further into the results you can click on the links like a regular search engine (benefit of integrated search results)

Like how many times does it need to repeat the same thing over and over again?

Because I want it to be and I like it this way :) if you prefer all responses to be more brief you can change it using the system prompt:

I asked it to say the same thing but to be brief:

The phrase suggests skepticism about AI’s ability to accurately summarize web content without introducing errors or distortions, likening the process to a “game of telephone” where information gets garbled as it passes through multiple layers (e.g., original source → AI interpretation → human sharing). The user is implying that relying on AI for this could lead to misinformation.

The cool thing is that no search engine can assist in such a personalised way like this

This is cool as heck:

Anyway thanks for your time, time to sleep

You use AI for writing prompts? That’s pretty cool, a lot of people use AI for writing prompts, a lot of writers say it’s great for getting rid of writers block

I don’t use ChatGPT, I use LM Studio which runs Local LLMs (it’s like AI you can run locally on your PC, I have solar and a solar battery so this means there’s no co2 emissions from my queries, I primarily use this for coding questions and practice, translations from Russian/Ukrainian/French, practising french, etc), then I use mistral AI second (french based), then third perplexity (american)

I also use Ecosia.org for searches as well

I asked mistralai/mistral-small-3.2 to elaborate on what you said, Is this what you meant?

The phrase “Let’s just keep adding more and more layers like a game of telephone!” is a metaphorical way of expressing skepticism or concern about the accuracy and reliability of information as it gets passed through multiple layers of interpretation, especially when involving AI systems.

Here’s what it likely means in this context:

1. Game of Telephone Analogy: In the classic “game of telephone” (or “Chinese whispers”), a message is whispered from one person to another in a line, and by the time it reaches the end, the original message is often distorted or completely changed due to mishearing, misinterpretation, or intentional alteration. The user is suggesting that relying on AI systems to search, summarize, or interpret web content might introduce similar layers of potential inaccuracies or biases.

2. Layers of Interpretation: The “layers” could refer to the steps involved in using an AI system to access and summarize information:

   • The original web content (first layer).
   • The AI’s interpretation or summarization of that content (second layer).
   • Any further human interpretation or sharing of the AI’s output (additional layers).

3. Concerns About Accuracy: The user might be implying that each additional “layer” (especially when involving AI) could introduce errors, biases, or misinterpretations, much like how a message gets distorted in the game of telephone.

4. Hostility Toward AI: Given the context you provided (Lemmy users being “strongly anti-AI”), this comment likely reflects a broader distrust of AI’s ability to accurately and reliably convey information without introducing new problems.

In essence, the user is cautioning against blindly trusting AI systems to handle information retrieval and summarization, suggesting that doing so could lead to a breakdown in accuracy or meaning, similar to how a message degrades in a game of telephone.

What do you mean?

It’s all good, Lemmy users are strongly anti-ai and are genuinely learning right now that chatgpt, mistral, perplexity etc can search the web

chatGPT: I asked my hairstylist their uninformed opinion on a world event based on overheard conversations

LLM’s have been able to search the web for a few years now

The main one outside of ChatGPT is https://www.perplexity.ai/

You can also look at hosting your version with Local LLM’s:

https://olares.medium.com/building-a-local-perplexity-alternative-with-perplexica-ollama-and-searxng-71602523e256

what do you mean? it’s like being angry that people bring up I googled something

lemmy finds out that the police do more than just appearing in green left weekly articles after beating up a minority

this is what the fediverse needs

We don’t want to make Wikipedia-style appeals

do it

Why are you using grok4?

sorry mate that was a joke, not a literal statement

I disagree it’s fun, at this rate by 2035 we’ll need to pay users to use lemmy

They will say something like solar went from 600gw to 1000 thats a 66% increase this year and coal only increased 40% except coal is 3600gw to 6400.

Hrmmmm, maybe these numbers are outdated? Based on this coal and gas are down:

In Q1 2025, solar generation rose 48% compared to the same period in 2024. Solar power reached 254 TWh, making up 10% of total electricity. This was the largest increase among all clean energy sources.

Coal-fired electricity dropped by 4%, falling to 1,421 TWh.

Gas-fired power also went down by 4%, reaching 67 TWh

https://carboncredits.com/china-sets-clean-energy-record-in-early-2025-with-951-tw/

are no where close to what is required to meet their climate goals

Which ones in particular are you talking about?

Trump signs executive order directing US withdrawal from the Paris climate agreement — again

https://apnews.com/article/trump-paris-agreement-climate-change-788907bb89fe307a964be757313cdfb0

China vowed on Tuesday to continue participating in two cornerstone multinational arrangements – the World Health Organization and Paris climate accord – after newly sworn-in US President Donald Trump ordered withdrawals from them.

https://www.france24.com/en/live-news/20250121-china-says-committed-to-who-paris-climate-deal-after-us-pulls-out

What’s that saying? You hate it when the person you hate is doing good? I can’t remember what it is

I can’t fault them for what they’re doing at the moment, even if they are run by an evil dictatorship and do pollute the most

I’m not sure how european defense spending is relevant

It suggests there is money available in the bank to fund solar/wind/battery, but instead they are preparing for? something? what? who knows. France can make a fighter jet at home but not solar panels apparently.

Prehaps they would be made in a country with environmental and labour laws if governments legislated properly to prevent companies outsourcing manufacturing. However this doesnt absolve china. China isnt being forced at Gunpoint to produce these goods with low labour regulation and low environmental regulation.

You’re right, it doesn’t absolve china, and I avoid purchasing things from them wherever possible, my solar panels and EV were made in South Korea, my home battery was made in Germany, there are only a few things in my house made in China, most of them I got second hand but unfortunately there is no escaping the giant of manufacturing.

With that said it’s one thing for me to sit here and tut tut at China, but I realise I am not most people, the most clearest example is the extreme anti-ai, anti-billionaire bias on this platform, in real life most people don’t give a fuck, they love Amazon/Microsoft/Google/Apple etc, they can’t go a day without them.

So I consider myself a realist, if you want people to buy your stuff then you will need to make the conditions possible for them to WANT to buy your stuff, not out of some moral lecture and Europe isn’t doing that, if we look at energy prices:

Can someone actually point out to me where this comes from? … At the end of the day energy is a small % of EU household spending

I was looking at corporate/business energy use:

Major European companies are already moving to cut costs and retain their competitive edge.

For example, Thyssenkrupp, Germany’s largest steelmaker, said on Monday it would slash 11,000 jobs in its steel division by 2030, in a major corporate reshuffle.

https://oilprice.com/Latest-Energy-News/World-News/High-Energy-Costs-Continue-to-Plague-European-Industry.html

Prices have since fallen but are still high compared to other countries.

A poll by Germany’s DIHK Chambers of Industry and Commerce of around 3,300 companies showed that 37% were considering cutting production or moving abroad, up from 31% last year and 16% in 2022.

For energy-intensive industrial firms some 45% of companies were mulling slashing output or relocation, the survey showed.

“The trust of the German economy in energy policy is severely damaged,” Achim Dercks, DIHK deputy chief executive said, adding that the government had not succeeded in providing companies with a perspective for reliable and affordable energy supply.

https://www.reuters.com/business/energy/more-german-companies-mull-relocation-due-high-energy-prices-survey-2024-08-01/

I’ve seen nothing to suggest energy prices in the EU are SO cheap that it’s worth moving manufacturing TO Europe, and this is what annoys me the most.

I’ve pointed this out before but they have an excellent report on the issues:

https://commission.europa.eu/document/download/97e481fd-2dc3-412d-be4c-f152a8232961_en?filename=The+future+of+European+competitiveness+_+A+competitiveness+strategy+for+Europe.pdf

Then they put out this Competitive Compass:

https://commission.europa.eu/topics/eu-competitiveness/competitiveness-compass_en

But tbh every week in the EU it seems like they are chasing after some other goal.

This would be great, it would have been greater 10 years ago.

Agreed