The homeless lobby is notoriously bad.
Reddit refuge
The homeless lobby is notoriously bad.
It is more that both browsers are by their respective companies to create the Internet they want.
IE intentionally gimped higher level browser usage as a way to defend the Windows monopoly. Web apps in IE would never be developed to the quality they could compete against natively run programs in Windows.
Chromium works to keep the Internet open and platform agnostic, but keeps tracking and cookies because Google makes money on the Internet by serving ads online.
Major powers in direct conflict with each other.
For instance, the Spanish Civil War is seen as a precursor to World War II, but it isn’t considered a part of World War II because different sides supported different belligerents, including direct military action, the conflict remained in Spain.
This is part of the reason why NATO nations have not provided direct military action to support Ukraine, as it would lead to a likely escalation to World War III.
I’m putting enough money away that I see myself retiring. At minimum, I would transition to a less stressful job about 10 years away from retirement and ride that out as I go to work less and less.
That said, I know I’ll kill myself if my health degrades too much. I haven’t decided what would happen if I run out of money.
How did they gimp it?
I’d just let it go. Why put so much effort into a group that doesn’t want your participation?
Lemmy is filled with political content. Voyager is probably just showing what is most popular if you are viewing all, which is going to show a lot of political content.
The best options is to curate a subscribed list or block political subs you don’t want to see.
This is the best you can do.
We get that it is the design philosophy for Mastodon to not have an algorithm serving content, but it appears to be a non-starter for a lot of users of Twitter like services.
In theory, a third party could write that algorithm and implement it in some form. Truth Social functions like that, but without federating to the rest of Mastodon.
More like Miami with less booze and weed.
In the long run, yes.
In the short term, no.
Theme parks is really only an Orlando thing. A large chunk of tourist Florida is hotels by the beach.
I feel like those who end up in your position end up one of two ways.
You know that you don’t have a safety net, so you don’t spend money more than you need to. Also, since it sounds like you support your family significantly, a lot of money that would go to vacations instead goes to them.
For others, money was an on/off switch; you either have it or you don’t. These kinds of people will spend at or above their means because they can and there aren’t any hard limits due to a lot of credit options.
Any reason why in particular?
What kind of tourist traps?
Egypt is the kind of country where I want to see things in it, but I kind of want to get the sanitized experience if I go there.
I feel like you need to be in a certain mindset to enjoy a theme park like Disney World. If you aren’t in that mindset, the place is a saccharine place of over-stimulation.
It is a good comparison. There is a lot to see in both cities and they have good transit systems, but it can be really disorienting if you aren’t used to city life and the grime of cities is harder to hide.
I wasn’t a big fan of Bermuda, but I feel like it was more to do with what I like to do when traveling.
Food was expensive and kind of bland. There wasn’t that much to see or do other than relax by a body of water and drink.
On life? If I have an extremely disabling condition to my mind or I can expect to die soon with a very low quality of life.
I don’t see addiction as being that disabling as there are a lot of available resources to treat addiction and a high enough success rate to try.