If you’re sure you’ve got a DNS entry for the Pihole FQDN pointing at Traefik, open the dev panel in your browser (F12), switch it to the Network tab, and visit the pihole URL.
See if you get anything back and especially take note of the HTTP status codes.
Can you see the router and service in the Traefik dashboard and do they show any errors there?
I think you’re close.
You need to change service: pihole-rtr to service: pihole-svc.
Do I have to redefine all of the same information I did in my Traefik yml but in this separate config.yml?
No, you just need to reference it like you have. Define once, reference many.
No worries for the question. It’s not terribly intuitive.
The configs live on the Traefik server. In my static traefik.yml config I have the following providers section, which adds the file provider in addition to the docker provider which you likely already have:
providers:
docker:
endpoint: "unix:///var/run/docker.sock"
exposedByDefault: false
file:
directory: /config
watch: true
And in the /config folder mapped into the Traefik container I have several files for services external to docker. You can combine them or keep them separate since the watch: true setting tells it to read in all files (and it’s near instant when you create them, no need to restart Traefik).
Here is my homeassistant.yml in that folder (I have a separate VM running HASS outside of Docker/Traefik):
http:
routers:
homeassistant-rtr:
entryPoints:
- https
service: homeassistant-svc
rule: "Host(`home.example.com`)"
tls:
certResolver: examplecom-dns
services:
homeassistant-svc:
loadBalancer:
servers:
- url: "http://hass1.internal.local:8123"
Hope this helps!
I use the Traefik file provider for this.
https://doc.traefik.io/traefik/providers/file/
It picks up all my .yml configs in the watched folder which define the routers and services external to Docker.
Thank you. Why does everything have to be a goddamn video?!
(rhetorical question)
I know plenty account SNI already, but thanks. You might want to study more yourself, since we’re being condescending.
So now your ISP sees all of your queries instead of CF. (Assuming the cloudflared option is using DoH)
I’ll trust Cloudflare over Comcast/AT&T/etc. any day of the week.
I found it amusing that these posts were adjacent.
Exactly. Show me the Authentication-Results header or gtfo.
Hyper-V is decent. It’s VMM that is atrocious. Hopefully you don’t have Citrix with MCS catalogs.
Yeah, but that security patch level.
I believe you. I’m just saying their non-firewalls (i.e., switches and APs) don’t have that limitation.
My firewall is a Fortigate 60F.
I would never use their firewalls/gateways, but their switches are pretty good for the price and their APs are decent (although tbh after 3 generations my next AP will likely be an enterprise Aruba).
That said, I still use Unifi in docker, everything is up to date, and nothing is requiring a sign-in to the cloud. Am I missing something? If it’s just the firewalls, then I’m not surprised since I’ve never been remotely tempted to use them, but it sure isn’t all of their devices.
FYI, making you the product is only a tiny part of their stated reasoning:
The definition I learned for web 2.0, as it was happening, was a shift from static web pages generated all at once on the server and delivered to the client whole, to using Ajax with in-browser Javascript dynamically changing already-delivered pages with back-end XML calls.
Look man, it’s okay to be wrong. It’s a natural part of growth.
But when you double down on your ignorance instead of taking the opportunity to open your mind and listen to the experts in the room, you just end up embarrassing yourself.
Try to be better.
We can restrict the use of software TOTP, which is what companies are doing when they move users onto the MS Authenticator app.
Admins can’t control the other TOTP apps like Google Authenticator or Authy unless they go full MDM. And I don’t think someone worried about installing the MS Authenticator app is going to be happy about enrolling their phone in Intune.
Edit: And even then, there is no way to control or force users to use a managed device for software TOTP.
I’m not sure about color support without HTML or add-ons, but Obsidian is a good markdown editor with a lot of functionality and extensibility.
It’s not open source but it runs on everything.