As a resident gen z… I’m right there with ya bud.

Moral objectivism is pretty much the argument that inevitably always ends with an authoritarian regime to “eliminate” the “unethical” people from society. Germany first, and all that.

See but you’re assuming that we agree to your axiomatic premise that there is no moral difference between the two.

We reject your premise. Prove there’s no difference.

More than half of America lives paycheck to paycheck. Vegan options are more expensive. Until you fix the economic crisis and solve poverty you really can’t enforce veganism.

This isn’t even getting into the fact that vegan options are literally nonexistent in many places.

Oh but you don’t care about that because you only care about veganism because it allows you to feel morally superior to others.

“Carnism” that’s the difference between vegans and non-vegans.

Only vegans view their diet as a lifestyle and shit on everyone else who isn’t vegan. We’re not “carnists” we don’t give a fuck really except that we hate vegans. Why? Because you lot are the pushiest, most openly judgemental, arrogant pieces of shit to walk the earth.

“have a little priest.”

This is because capitalism requires infinite growth… which is literally fucking impossible so everything either grows infinitely or dies… or option three: gets so fucking big it abuses governance to prevent itself from dying while murdering it’s competition.

Did I say anything about liking their stances? No. They’re a private company though. They can do as they fucking please.

In fact the only way to force them to not censor anyone is to eliminate their (the owners) first amendment rights. That’s why private companies are not beholden to it. Unfortunately this concept is foreign to right wing nuts.

“Censorship” lol, cry harder.
Her platform, her rules. Don’t like it? Leave. This ain’t a government, you have no free speech rights here or anywhere else on the internet, don’t like how a site operates/what a site allows? Then leave.

If you could edit in an instance-agnostic link (!communityname@host-instance.com) for example: !newcommunities@lemmy.world would be this one.

Makes finding your community on other instances easier (and is technically required for our formatting rules)

If your point is that phenotype at all defines sex, you are objectively wrong. It is a function of sex. If your point is that phenotype is a reliable indicator of sexing in humans, you are also objectively wrong.

Phenotype doesn’t determine sex. It’s a function of it. You literally agreed with me on this.

Tell me you don’t understand biology and genetics without telling me you don’t understand biology and genetics. You’ve succeeded.

Also biology hates binaries. Nature hates binaries. They’re exceedingly rare.

Sexing in humans isn’t phenotypic though. It is chromosomal.

You can actually blame Disney for much of this.