• 0 Posts
  • 10 Comments
Joined 19 days ago
cake
Cake day: June 30th, 2025

help-circle



  • Part4@infosec.pubtoProgrammer Humor@programming.devVibe Coding
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    I would describe myself as close to the person you replied to in terms of skill level, and have been using llm’s in a similar fashion to the one they described, and get great results. I think the key thing is to know enough to understand what is happening, and see where the llm’s limitations are, and use it as a learning resource to actively improve while using it. Then be as specific as possible when asking questions.

    Not only is it great in terms of getting working code, I have found chatgpt to be the best teacher I have ever had! (Because of availability etc). I think they must have trained the llm’s I have used on a lot of computer and coding sources.

    I think the key is to learn at least the basics of coding first.There are scores of 5 to 25 hour long courses on most major programming languages on sites like udemy. Coding can definitely be hard to get your head around at first, but stick with it and do as many of those as it takes, or a night class or something.

    If someone isn’t prepared to invest a week or two (in truth I spent a lot longer than that studying coding but I wan’t particularly time-efficient in my prior learning), then treat the llm as a learning resource, then good luck! I would guess the llm will be able to come up with any idea they can anyway soon enough!



  • It isn’t introvertion.

    OP said ‘what animal would you be if you were an animal?’

    It is insulting to expect everybody to engage in conversation any time some moron expects it.

    The respondent, reasonably said ‘I’ll ask chatgpt’ which is a polite way of saying ‘I’m not interested in this shite, Bore off, I’m not eight, leave me alone.’

    OP then came online to make a big deal about it, claiming the respondent used chatgpt rather than socialising. Which itself is evidence of OP’s character and evidence as to why one might not want to engage with the boring **** at work.

    Wrong. The only thing there is evidence they did is use chatgpt to deflect a fucking boring conversation.

    Now please leave me alone. This is all fucking obvious. I am just blocking any respondents to this message in order to avoid timewasting, thanks.

    Edit - oh this is an anti-ai sub. OK, so anything done with ai is automatically bad, you have chosen a side and that is that.

    :There is much to dislike about ‘ai’ technology - primarily its energy use, but the claims of intelligence is also something reasonable to dislike. There is much more to dislike about the people who own ‘ai’ and the uses they want to put it to, but that is neo-liberal capitalism you should be angry at, not ‘ai’. This sub is misguided at best. Block it is.