ShimmeringKoi [comrade/them]

Blind Drunk. I know for a near fact that nobody’s heard of them because they have like 2K subs, but they’re good as hell. They make a drinking game out of reading trash right wing books by people like Boris Johnson, Ben Shapiro, and the dork who wrote the Turner Diaries. But despite how messy and dark things could get with that premise, it’s some of the funniest, best put together and most insightful content I’ve ever seen on the subject of fascism and fascist psychology.

Love me some Peach Cobbler too.

https://youtu.be/OOUQ28oTsVY

Of the few tracks, this one’s my favorite

Those fucking bloodthirsty tankies don’t want us sending more tanks to nazis

Widespread public support for a government is alien to the mind of the liberal

In terms of propaganda sources, for example just take a look at Russia Today.

You think Russia Today accounts for the massive worldwide upswell in communist and anti-imperialist sentiment over the last few years

My guy, you clearly just listed the first Russian news outlet you could think of. In the very last sentence too, after like a paragraph of tangential whining, as if anybody asked. It’s such a transparent attempt to bait my attention away from your inability to defend your dumbass theory, and then you top it off with “uhh anyway, millions of people around the world suddenly got hooked on Russia Today.” Deeply unserious. I assume you can pull up google trends and verify this massive spike in readership, right?

Yeah man, it’s not the warmongering, the lies, the genocide, the complete capitalist destruction of any social fabric, hope for the future, international peace or survivable environment. It’s just the sinister Chinese and die Russich swine working to sow dissent among us freedom loving people.

You are a dipshit, a liberal, and a useful idiot for fascism, but I repeat myself. One thing you are currently not is any kind of leftist.

Genocidal invasion

The US is doing an actual genocide in Palestine, but thanks for telling everyone you don’t know what words mean

We need to make more parentiwave tbh, we’ve been slacking on that

I’m curious, where do you think so many westerners are exposed to Russian propaganda? Because there are apparently so many victims of it these days, can’t turn a corner without someone decrying all these damn Russian and Chinese shill everywhere. So where do we all come from? What exactly did we get exposed to? I know this is the part where you handwave the question away with a “Heh, they got exposed to devious foreign thought on the freaking internet” but I’m not letting you off that easy. Tell me what you think the actual specific vectors are for all this “Russian and Chinese propaganda” you see everywhere, and how it was apparently able to easily penetrate the absolute haze of American propaganda that all of us in “the west” have been force fed our entire lives.

Please account for this gaping hole in your social theory. Why so many tankies, how, and why now?

Im not the person who replied to you but I picked up on what you meant

The Menendez brothers are innocent! (of mass murder)

Great, I love having to make room for 40GB of digital hair.

Pepes are like a stetson hat and big belt buckle: not explicitly a symbol of shitty politics, but most popular with people who have them.

Friend gave me one of those pre-workout energy drinks and it got opened so I didn’t want to let it go to waste. Effect was “I can’t sleep and I’m angry”

My internal legal counsel has advised me not to discuss the topic with myself

I wonder if it’s better to do an assassination horned up, or with post-nut clarity. Most would say the latter, but I think there’s something to be said for being in a mental state of high body/breathing awareness and sensitivity if you’re using anything scoped. Having just busted brings a less tender, more businesslike mindset, probably the better to get rough.

So for that reason I think post-nut clarity would be ideal for a brute force hand-to-hand confrontation, but gooning is better for the marksman

Goku inflation

SMH if only there had been someone out there to tell him about bluechew

Dealt with accordingly? You mean like assassinated? Just for their political beliefs about assassination? Sounds pretty terroristic, man

The most perturbing question for the liberal is the question of violence. The liberal’s initial reaction to violence is to try to convince the oppressed that violence is an incorrect tactic, that violence will not work, that violence never accomplishes anything. The Europeans took America through violence and through violence they established the most powerful country in the world. Through violence they maintain the most powerful country in the world. It is absolutely absurd for one to say that violence never accomplishes anything.

Today power is defined by the amount of violence one can bring against one’s enemy — that is how you decide how powerful a country is; power is defined not by the number of people living in a country, it is not based on the amount of resources to be found in that country, it is not based upon the good will of the leaders or the majority of that people. When one talks about a powerful country, one is talking precisely about the amount of violence that that country can heap upon its enemy. We must be clear in our minds about that. Russia is a powerful country, not because there are so many millions of Russians but because Russia has great atomic strength, great atomic power, which of course is violence. America can unleash an infinite amount of violence, and that is the only way one considers America powerful. No one considers Vietnam powerful, because Vietnam cannot unleash the same amount of violence. Yet if one wanted to define power as the ability to do, it seems to me that Vietnam is much more powerful than the United States. But because we have been conditioned by Western thoughts today to equate power with violence, we tend to do that at all times, except when the oppressed begin to equate power with violence — then it becomes an “incorrect” equation.

From “The Pitfalls of Liberalism” by Kwame Ture