But the developer doesn’t need to provide support if you opt to use your own data storage and the storage itself fails. Google would be the one to contact if Google drive has an issue.

Well yes, but that’s not how your average user thinks and acts. They will either a) contact you as the developer of the app that doesn’t seem to work and when your say it’s not your fault give you bad reviews or b) directly give you bad reviews.

I still haven’t adopted to this git switch thing

I kinda like the boxed corals

You either don’t know what binary search is or you completely missed the context of this conversation

What’s wrong with postman?

Well idk the details in that specific case, this was just the first example I found. My point is, that different countries, states and institutions disagree on this matter. There is no universal rule that defines what you need to have achieved to call yourself an engineer.

another is regulatory requirements by jurisdictions to be able to legally assume a role.

This is exactly what I mean with “this depends on the country you live in”. Different countries have vastly different regulatory requirements. Taking UK as an example, you can call yourself civil engineer all day long without having to worry any legal consequences because there simply is no such thing as a licensing system for engineers.

As a former civil engineer who now works in software, “software engineer” irks me. “Engineer” means you’re supposed to be licensed

This really depends on the country you live in. In some countries you need a license, some need you to have some kind of university degree and others don’t care at all. So we cannot really use that measure as a definition.

By that definition almost all people who call themselves software engineers would be wrong. That doesn’t automatically mean, you’re wrong though.

Personally, I disagree with your definition of software engineers needing to directly interact with hardware stuff in order to be engineers. Wikipedia defines software engineering as

the application of systematic desciplined, quantifiable approach to development, operation and maintenance of software and the study of these approaches; that is, the application of engineering and computer science to software.

So it’s all about the systematic approach to complex systems, not about whether or not you directly interact with hardware interfaces.

similar story here, just that little me wrote his snake program with windows forms. Every element of the game was a button. I remember the first versions beeing so inefficient (rebuilding the whole UI that was made of loads of small buttons every few milliseconds) that my Intel core 2 duo couldn’t run it properly. Good times.

Wait, what happened?

The only thing she’s mad about is that he wants to code in brainfuck

I only partly agree. The part remembers all those situations where a comment on reddit almost made me spit out my coffee while at work because I found it truly hilarious

This should be higher up underrated comment

FTFY

Yes because this isn’t a reddit phenomenon but a human psychology phenomenon

Hope you are good at explaining the benefits of rewriting bad code.

That’s easy. If you rewrite the bad code now, that creates work and costs. If you leave it as is, it might go through for a few years and is somewhat likely to be someone else’s problem by then. /s

Also, shrimps IS bugs! Someone should get a tattoo of that.

Absolutely!

Sure, but who explains to the stakeholders then that I spend days coding but without implementing one of the new features they requested

I can physically feel the pain in the first one