I’m pretty sure it used to be easier with phones that didn’t have full disk encryption.

It’s a UI design tool. It’s what UI and UX designers use to create mockups that are then given to frontend programmers to implement.

Patenting obvious solutions is done all the time and perfectly fine from a legal point of view.

That’s intentional. Apple knows they won’t win in the long run, so their strategy is to delay the change for as long as possible.

They didn’t need the army of lawyers to get license deals, so that’s not a fair comparison.

I’m using an R86S.

Good post. Also, in the case of GitHub, one major reason for me for using it is that this is the first place a potential employer will look at to see my work. They won’t delve into the depths of a random git hosting service nobody has ever heard about.

I didn’t know that “emit” is a verb that can be used for such an action.

I don’t think that any of those places have legal protection against a sellout like that.

Yes.

Depends on the location of the instance. The EU and California have laws for that, for example.