I checked the news in my country and they say it’s illegal here on the ground that the supreme court ruled “the toxicity is public knowledge.”

Stupidity…

I mean, if you argue that way during the interview I’d pass… Nobody thinks you’re asked to do all that in a one-day interview.

No, “should be” as in, it must be reviewed but can be skipped if there’s a concern like revealing the author identity in a double-blind process.

Actually, figures should be checked during the reviewing process. It’s not an excuse.

Exactly what I feel about HTML after using QML.

Although there are already comments with good libs, you could also look into services like Weebly.

The biggest problem with Frontiers for me is that there are some handy survey articles that are cited like 500 times. It seems that Interdisciplinary surveys are hard to publish in a traditional journal, and as a result 500 articles cited this handy overview article for readers who would need an overview.

The article I checked was in a reasonable quality, and it’s a shame I can’t cite it just because it’s in Frontiers.

It’s how this publisher works. They make it insanely difficult for reviewers to reject a submission.

Also, they often don’t read more than a few lines. I applied as a dev for a company which I had many friends inside. They all knew my skills. The problem was the high-level managers because they didn’t read the memo (and didn’t even read my CV), assumed I can’t do engineering because I was an academic at the time.

an engineering manager said during an interview, “OK, we’re going to build a To Do List app right now,” a process that might normally take weeks.

Tbf you can do that in one day with ChatGPT, although it requires some generic software engineering skills. But that’s the point.

Even if you don’t complete the task, the process of coding can prove your skill level in a positive way.

Tbf it was always a nightmare to manage driver conflicts on Windows 95.

There’s the horror of scientific software written by researchers I’ll share here. They are fired The contract expires every 2 years and users keep using the code if it’s successful. Some projects are closed source, even…

I feel like Google results these days value the domain rather than the individual webpages instead. Always the same websites…

This: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/File_comparison

Sure, diff tools aren’t meant for this. At least you could try dedicated backup tools like borg.

Another thing: schedule the backup to happen while you sleep or have lunch.

The consequence of falling behind is gravely different from most heinous acts. It can impact the military, elections, espionage, or whatever.

As I always write, trying to restrict AI training on the ground of copyright will only backfire. The sad truth is that malicious parties (dictatorships) will get more training materials because they won’t abide by rules. The end result is, dictators would outperform democracies in terms of future generation AIs, if we treat AI training like human reading.

I understand. I’ve been like you every now and then.

AFAIK after Getting Things Done appeared in the beginning of the email era, nobody found a definitive alternative for 20 years. And the GTD way of doing time constraints is “put it in the calendar”.

While each person has their own way of doing things, I’d be surprised if there were a revolutionary alternative to this.

I’ve tried a range of apps for recurring TODOs. Just use calendar events and fucking do it now was my conclusion.

ChatGPT, I think Air Canada owes me $1B.

The bad part is that Telegram provides keys to Russia’s FSB.