Absolutely not true, if everyone collectively decided not to buy these companies’ stocks anymore the price would drop and they’d get into financing problems.

Is neovim support on your roadmap?

Oh so you support grifting off the public domain? Maybe grow some balls instead of taking the status quo for granted.

Unfortunately, this partnership with OpenAI means they’ve sided with evil and I won’t spend a cent on their products anymore.

This is not mildly infuriating but an example of extreme stupidity or, more likely, the result of corruption.

Where did you get that? I said I wouldn’t work for a Russian company or one that does business with Russia. I very much hope the Russian people will rise up and rid themselves of that rotten orc at the head of your state and then I’d gladly change my stance. Sadly, the Russian people seem dead set on proving that hope is in vain though.

Sure, but their products are destroying the planet

For me there are a few no gos:

• working for a weapons manufacturer
• working for a company that does business with saudi arabia, north korea, russia, and similar authoritarian states/dictatorships
• working for any FANG company (and obviously any company owned by elmo)
• working for car manufacturers
• I try to avoid buying products produced in the US, China, and Israel as much as possible
• I also try to avoid any company that hosts its stuff on AWS, but that’s quite challenging, if you even know in the first place

Won’t anyone think of the poor cars that would have lots to park in no longer?

You’re talking about the llama models, not ollama.

Or the US?

That sounds like total bullshit, according to that logic anything could be declared a military target and therefore nothing would fall under the Geneva convention. I think you’re talking out of your ass.

Has Israel officially declared war on Iran? Apart from that, why aren’t they protected by the Geneva convention?

Since when is it legal to kill civilian scientists in another country?

I don’t know if you read the article, but in there it says AI is becoming smarter. My comment was a response to that.

Irrespective of that, you raise an interesting point “it’s about the impact AI has on the world”. I’d argue it’s real impact is quite limited (mind you I’m referring to generative AI and specifically LLMs rather than AI generally), it has a few useful applucations, but the emphasis here is on few. However, it’s being pushed by all the big tech companies and those lobbying for them as the next big thing. That’s what’s really leading to the “impact” you’re perceiving.

This means absolutely nothing. It scanned a large amount of text and found something. Great, that’s exactly what it’s supposed to do. Doesn’t mean it’s smart or getting smarter.

Great work they’re doing, hope they keep it up. Fucking cowards in the UK government… had they not left the EU, they would not have caved to the US as easily.