Sure but the chances of your Windows and Linux machines shitting the bed at the same time is less than if everything is running Windows. It’s exactly the same reason you keep a physical copy (which after all can break/burn down etc.) - more baskets to spread your eggs across.
I’m not sure how to break this to you but this is just an internet forum, not a court of law
I’m waiting for the post mortem before declaring this to not be anything to do with MS tbh. It’s only affecting windows systems and it wouldn’t be the first time dumb architectural decisions on their part have caused issues (why not run the whole GUI in kernel space? What’s the worst that could happen?)
Gonna be a nice test of proper backups and disaster recovery protocols for some organisations
Got to get to Mars for those
He doesn’t exactly come across as happy…
Congratulations on failing the Turing test I guess?
This is why I always rename all the variables in the project on each PR.
I just drink normal Yorkshire tea, I’m not made of money.
Money is a hell of an aphrodisiac
I’m not a good enough artist to draw it but Minecraft spiders also clearly have anime eyes and a red bow on their heads.
If it were really that easy to adapt there would be no reason not to support Firefox in the first place…
“In the dark all cats are grey”
I mean it’s not a bad point, IE once had the market dominance that chrome does now. By all means continue only supporting one engine but at least be aware that you’re gambling on the browser market not shifting again as it has done in the past.
It’s always true for sufficiently large values of “a few”
This particular arms race began a couple of decades ago at least…
Like, the selling feature of all three is that they don’t use a runtime
Microsoft:
Napalm? Pretty sure the answer is napalm.
Also what’s your date of birth and mother’s maiden name?
Careful you don’t cut yourself on all that edge