hypelightfly

Claims to be, actually isn’t. Just an idiot tankie. Tankies aren’t communists.

Mass deportation of children is literally (one of) the dictionary definitions of genocide.

Not using proprietary protocols isn’t lagging behind.

User agent. Google wants you to use Chrome. You can spoof the user agent in Firefox to get the same results.

You’re talking abut the search bar at the top of the first home screen right? It’s always google but it can be removed.

That should be fixed for sure, it’s annoying. Personally I use firefox anyway so I change it to the firefox search widget which uses your firefox default.

I have a phone with stock android 13, which would be the same experience as a Pixel or other stock android phone.

Here’s the process for me:

1. Tap chrome
2. Tap vertical … menu
3. Tap settings
4. Tap search engine (it’s the top option under basic settings and visible without scrolling)
5. Tap DuckDuckGo (or bing or whatever)

Definitely not 30-50 steps on a phone setup by Google. Only real complaint is it can’t be changed from the search field itself.

https://developers.cloudflare.com/cache/reference/csam-scanning/

It’s free.

Yes, and it works without all the legal issues involved with doing it yourself.

I don’t know about Europe but the cheap iphone (SE I think unless they changed the name I don’t follow apple too much) is the same price as the 6a.

No jumping involved. I read the transcript, it’s shitty clickbait content. You’re being awfully hypocritical with your assumptions.

I don’t disagree with the conclusions, the issue is with how it’s being presented.

Yea the title might be a bit clickbaity

Then you do get it.

What conclusion do you think I’ve jumped to?

Also, transcripts don’t solve the problem of shit content designed for video. It’s the same script.

It provides far more information than the shitty clickbait title. It actually informs people on the content of the video.

The video is 17 minutes. Their comment is 2 sentences.

I find this type of information in video form to be insufferable. Just like putting something like “watch before commenting” in your title.

Quick math shows that’s irrelevant with a 4% revenue cap, as I pointed out in my original comment, and at best they will be paid the same as just doing a 4% revenue fee. More likely they will get some amount less than 4% from most devs.

The only reason I see for them going this route instead is to claim they are still royalty free, install fees aren’t royalties. Which is BS anyway.

No, it’s not. memes is the community we are currently in. Subscribing to memes is not “moving”.

Especially as Lemmy has even worse moderator tools than reddit (without custom tools) and the devs don’t give a shit.

It works for that market too even without install fees, you just make it a percentage of revenue generated from microtransactions. It’s still tied to the game.

Still trying to shoehorn in a “runtime fee”. That’s not going to work and with this model it’s pointless anyway. Just make it a 4% revenue for sales after $1 million. Same end results (actually potentially more in fees) without all the runtime issues. Make it apply only to a specific version and later and after a certain date and then you also don’t have the retroactive problem and the massive blowback.