I mean, the rules would allow everybody to get around copyright in this way. A rule like that would apply to all the indie LORA trainers as well.
I mean, the rules would allow everybody to get around copyright in this way. A rule like that would apply to all the indie LORA trainers as well.
I don’t think this will make much difference honestly, we already have very little regulation here. It probably means that there will be copyright exemptions for training models. And honestly eroding copyright bit by bit is okay in my book.
What we should be worried about are the human rights that are about to be violated.
I try to keep things simple by only using GGG or PPP.
You cannot choose a world without AI. They will get built regardless of what you want.
With that in mind, the optimal (least bad) outcome is that your world views are represented in the dataset.
You’re trying to find maliciousness where there’s only incompetence.
Your Lemmy posts are already being scraped for AI
Good, hopefully it’ll make AI that is slightly less toxic than the rest of the internet.
It always baffles me that people don’t want their content represented in an AI - every word you write that gets indexed is a vote for how future AI will behave.
Rich people are counterintuitively more susceptible to bribery.
So for example in “requests”, a popular http framework in Python, there’s a class for the Response object. On that object you can access the special header dictionary at response.headers
. Check the docs here under the section Response Headers
Basically they make a special dictionary that allows headers to be case-insensitive, and combining headers that are provided twice.
But they also provide a special property response.encoding
which derives from the Content-Type header, just for convenience.
Hopefully that all makes sense.
The majority of HTTP frameworks I’ve used store headers in a dictionary, because the common denominator between all headers is that they are string keys and string values.
To clarify: you might think that some headers are lists of strings, but that’s not actually true - the user can send any string to you. You really open yourself up to parsing problems if somebody transmits a header in a format that cannot be represented by your data structure.
Oftentimes what a framework will do is store the headers in the dictionary, and then provide getters and setters to access “friendly” parsed versions of commonly used data (but only if it parses correctly).
Mostly so you can look at someone’s system and immediately know how many years old their software is.
Once version numbers get this high and you have stable multi year development, you might as well switch to “2024.1” style versioning.
I suppose it’s a better idea than I initially gave it credit for. It’s a new type of thermocouple, and processors do run at a fairly high heat gradient compared to ambient temperatures.
Good luck with the actual implementation though!
It seems we can’t have a reasonable discourse here because you are ignoring basic definitions. Have a lovely day!
Weapons are tools, by strict definition, and there are legitimate uses for them. Besides, my point was that they should be regulated. In fact, because they are less generally useful than constructive tools, they should be regulated far MORE strictly.
No, just an example. But if you’ve ever noticed the giant list of safety warnings on industrial machinery, you should know that every single one of those rules was written in blood.
There are always two paths to take - take away all of humanity’s tools or aggressively police people who abuse them. No matter the tool (AI, computers, guns, cars, hydraulic presses) there will be somebody who abuses it, and for society to function properly we have to do something about the delinquent minority of society.
That’s an extremely disappointing answer. You can’t put pressure on them if you have no leverage, and they know that. Something like a general strike would be far more effective and wouldn’t endanger our democracy.
What strategy might that be?
Agreed, I love Inter. Recently the Blender project migrated to it as well.
I dunno if this changes any of the UX paradigms, but I heard GIMP is about to release a huge major version.