pjhenry1216

This post has devolved into shit and filled with a bunch of whiners complaining about the same dumb shit that isn’t a goal of this phone. Might as well whine the new iPhone doesn’t cost under $400 for as reasonable of a complaint anything on this post is.

You can get a phone jack adapter for $5 moron.

It’s like complaining a new PC doesn’t come with USB-A and only USB-C.

Design decisions shouldn’t always be up to the end user. Every single option can’t always be included forever and ever.

If you want wired for quality, you need a DAC anyway. If you want wired otherwise, leave the adapter on your headphones.

Don’t let your inability to adapt stifle actual developmental progress.

Because everyone in the supply chain is being paid a fair wage and not being exploited.

Based on what? Cost? The whole premise is sustainability and ensuring the people who build it aren’t working sweatshop workers like with every other major phone. I say this knowing full well I’m using one of those phones but Fairphone has only recently become available in my country.

So it depends on if you want a bad deal by parting with some extra dollars or it’s a bad deal for the workers that are getting exploited so you save a few dollars.

You have $5 options.

It allowed them to increase the IP rating, allows for simplified manufacturing, and easier maintainability and repairability.

How is not including it considered greenwashing (I notice you didn’t ask about that, so I assume you know the answer)?

I despise people repeating comments. How is making the device cheaper, more sustainable, and more reliable greenwashing? I would love anybody who just loves complaining about the headphones jack to explain that. No one else has. I doubt anybody complaining really cares about the environment either. What phone do you currently have?

Weird. I could have sworn software comes on it too. Your phone doesn’t have software?

At that point you’re getting a very specific phone for a very specific purpose. It’s not the rule but the exception. So it doesn’t apply as a reason for any other phone. You’ve argued why the LG has a 3.5mm jack, not why Fairphone should have a 3.5mm jack. I’d also be curious as to how powerfully it can even drive headphones at that point. It must also have a stronger amplifier than most phones too. It’d be meaningless without it. What’s the point of high fidelity if it can’t drive headphones that can utilize it.

This is all getting away from the purpose of the Fairphone. It’s not a dedicated music player. It’s not advertising high fidelity music, psrticyij relation to other phones. I don’t think anyone is calling that LG phone “green” either.

Congratulations to anyone who can think of an edge case that wouldn’t apply to the Fairphone. Might as well mention a tensor chip not being in the Fairphone.

Who is listening to music on the same headset while making a phone call?

And why use your phone’s onboard DAC at that point if you want quality headphones?

Are your comprehension skills that of a four year old?

It doesn’t though. At best, it messes with the boot record (which has been mentioned) which isn’t deleting a partition. Windows can’t delete a partition it doesn’t actually use.

You can continue your inability to understand the actual details of what you’re talking about. I’m not defending Windows. I’m defending telling the truth about PCs. You can continue your fanboyism and inexperience with operating systems and hard drives.

Not everyone here is a Lemmy user. I just don’t like people making idiotic comments. There’s plenty do criticize about Windows without having to make stuff up due to lack of IT knowledge. If you claim calling out someone’s incorrect IT knowledge as a defending Windows, that’s just you being an idiot and knowing nothing of IT.

It’s amazing, bro that you expose your woefully inadequate knowledge. If you want to troll, don’t pretend to be anything else.

Have you looked at “System Configuration” (just type it in the Windows search box)? There’s a Boot tab that should allow you to set a default or remove others.

Someone having money isn’t an excuse to not call out poor behavior against them. Making nonsensical posts that are not even accurate from an IT perspective helps no one. At best, it’s just lies to get fake internet attention, at worst, it exposes a lack of understanding of the technology.

I’d argue one shouldn’t even be messing with dual booting if they don’t understand much about the bootloader.

I feel like they have poor track records in choosing books. They seem to only ever choose Young Adult Fiction… which isn’t bad, but if the ones they tend to choose, they’re usually very tropey.

And we have A24 studios. They seem to be doing a pretty good job lately.

This has been brought up before (not here, just in general). The short answer is they heavily customized the analytics so it’s not as ‘bad’ out of the box. You can read more about it below.

You can probably ask them directly if you’d want more of an answer. They don’t seem to be trying to hide anything.

https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1122305#c8

Edit: also, as far as I know, Firefox actively should be blocking Google Analytics, unless they changed it (which is possible). About four years ago, Firefox started blocking Google Analytics by default.

The potential for AI to grow into something much more capable, unbiased and fair then any of is can be is obvious

It absolutely is not obvious. AI, especially today, is usually either generative based on past examples or evolutionary based on given goals. Both of those come with obvious and extreme bias. Bias is actually an integral part of machine learning. It’s literally built into the system and is defined and controlled to achieve the results desired.

AI is and always will be biased, moreso by its creators, but absolutely by the information and frameworks provided to it. We have absolutely no idea how to approach the concept of an unbiased AI, or even defining what unbiased would look like. It’s philosophically extremely difficult to define what an unbiased person would think or do.

Edit: somehow I missed that last sentence fragment. I don’t think we’re in disagreement of the conclusion, but possibly just the details of how one arrives at it.