in this case, we know it’s not because they got rid of that option. Why? Because the task is infeasible to support.

You’re not making any sense.

the devs no longer offer it as a supported method

Are you saying that the Home Assistant developers used to support distro packages?

No one is saying it is impossible

OP is saying that. They said it was “infeasible”.

Well, yeah.

Why do you think that because a person could do something they necessarily will?

it isn’t actually that feasible then, otherwise you’d do more than just whine about it on the Internet

So let me get your logic straight: you’re saying that it isn’t feasible because if it were feasible then a person who could do it would necessarily do it? LOL that makes no sense.

Then do if for your distribution then.

I use Debian.

It’s clearly not that difficult, you’ve all but explicitly stated as much.

I have not said that, or anything like it.

Perhaps you missed the fact that I’m not a Home Assistant user and have no interest in contributing?

I’m not a Debian Developer and won’t become one: http://settrans.net/~rah/why-not-debian.html

Also, I’m not a Home Assistant user so I’ve no interest in contributing.

it could not feasible

I disagree.

You should ask this to your favourite distro packagers, not to the home assistant developers.

I disagree. The Home Assistant developers are the ones who chose to create an OS. They could have chosen to create distro packages instead, or at least software which is amenable to being packaged by distros.

obsolete

What does that mean in the context of Home Assistant?

on Discord

LibreCAD … not open source

FYI, “libre” means free, as in free speech:

https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.en.html

especially if someone on lemmy is WRONG, and you need to thumb a reply!

🤣

Chris Wanstrath … $1,000,000 donation

So… not independent then.

You may have missed that the best approach is not to switch but to dual-boot.

Eh?

is experimental

tl;dr

I’m glad you’ve realised that what you wrote was incorrect.

kinda does

“Kinda” meaning not actually.

as close as anything can be guaranteed

So not guaranteed then.

Spreading out stock purchases across the market guarantees returns over the long run.

No it doesn’t.

There is no code in a running kernel written in Python, Perl or Ruby. Those languages are used in kernel’s source code tree in supporting tools, they aren’t kernel code.

deleted by creator

non-GTK

What do you mean?

Gnome Software Store, Gnome Settings, System Monitor

All of these programs use GTK.