punishing people for downvoting AI slop
Now that would be quite the turn… Downvoting AI slop is the basic human decency I’d expect from Lemmy.
Hi you’re reading content by a non-AI person, 100% humane or at least furry.
Sometimes my posts are licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0. Feel free to contact me for an alternative licensing deal.
punishing people for downvoting AI slop
Now that would be quite the turn… Downvoting AI slop is the basic human decency I’d expect from Lemmy.
They could steal your personal data without you knowing.
Hah! Like the “legal” services are much better than that!
But there’s not really another good demonym that’s not an slur. “Estadosunidenses” is too much of a mouthful and “Statesman” has another meaning.
Usonian?
or Germany. And I only identify the latter as such, because of…
…ich_iel?
I still have human rights, as well as rights to eg.: privacy. Also it’s not like they put “we use CrowdStrike” in their job offerings you know, so you saying to just “work elsewhere” reads whiny. And petty.
Goes into the kernel
Gives remote absolute view and control of the machine
Removes user’s rights
Is intended to allow the employer class control the employee class
Sounds like malware to me!
If the kernel module Crowdstrike uses for Linux systems
Who who conscientiously uses Linux would allow a kernel level module solution such as this into their systems?
Is there an english equivalent?
Yes: “gratis”.
English is literally about mugging other languages in a backalley for words (and boning them for grammar). It’s the ISO standard procedure.
luck? I have a $5* wrench.
* (Actually a $7 wrench. Inflation is murder around here.)
But that can be said of any of the other such called factors:
A yubikey can be stolen
A fingerprint can be scanned and distributed
So its not really an argument against passwords (or passkeys, or passwordless, or whatever marketing want to call them these days).
Then they have the right to not continue publishing their stuff. That doesn’t affect the rights of the persons who already got their copy alongside the associated rights to consume it. Depending on the licensing terms, it might not even affect their granted right to redistribute, if any.
Isn’t the idea that not everyone has access to your biometrics?
There’s honestly no need to make computers ask people for piss scans:
something you know
A password
something you have
Access to the password
something you are
The person who knows the password
The fun thing about regressions: these things affects you if your system is new enough that it has the behaviour reintroduced. Which means you are less likely to be hit if you are using Debian Stable (or even Oldstable) than, say, Sid (unpatched at the time of writing this comment) or Arch btw.
Want to put some economic incentive to pirating? Make it a shared / solidarity pool. Or get in touch with a state / nation that has more active interest on digital sovereignty and preservation so that it can be set up as some sort of UBI.
cracking the games
to put some DRM on them
to sell them
Fam, half the point of pirating is getting harmful middlemans out of the way. If I wanted a game and it was available on the Cracked Store for, say, $10 plus $15 for the DRM unlock, I’d just go to 1337x or somesuch to get the normal pirated version.
I feel so silly that I wouldn’t even know how to describe it.
I know! I’ll pirate hundreds of books from well-known authors so that I can easily find a useful metaphor.
If Meta can pirate stuff, then the Internet Archive can pirate stuff and I can also pirate stuff. Fair is fair.
Where do you find such downloads? Most torrent sites I’ve seen barely give you anythng under 720p that is not 480p (or 144p 3gp for the lulz value, I guess?) these days.
Huh, didn’t know the 3DSXL could do 480p well, I always thought its limits were at about 360p (or 400p if such a profile existed). Can I ask how do you perform such encoding? Like, what encoder and options are you using. Oh and the battery usage. It’s for a book.
But… that’s how voting literally works. Hence one of the smartest ideas I saw once for Lemmy (and for the Fediverse in general) was to substitute upvoting/downvoting for “voting on tags”, such as being able to tag a post as “fake news”, “inspiring” or “AI generated” and have people vote on those instead of on the psot / comment proper. Alas, I don’t know what ever happened to that proposal, and could never find it again to track it down.
But, see, that’s the thing and that’s why there’s an important difference between blocking and downvoting:
If I block something bad, like say fake news or fascism or AI, I block it only for me, it’s only protecting myself; but if I downvote it, I also help protect my peers. If we want to make community, that’s very important. And like any measure, it can be gamed, but so long as it’s the one option we have, we gotta use like that. I expect AI slop to be batch-downvoted; if I didn’t, I’d be back at Reddit.