It’s been almost a full week since Unity announced its controversial Runtime Fee, and the developer backlash continues.

Studios around the world have expressed concerns that the new fee – charging them every time their game is installed after January 1, 2024, providing they meet certain thresholds – threatens to jeopardise the health, or even existence, of their business. And despite subsequent statements from Unity, it’s still not entirely apparent how badly these businesses will be affected.

“The most ridiculous part of this fiasco is that the full effects of Unity’s decision on the business aren’t even clear,” says Ustwo Games chief creative officer Danny Gray. “We’re left astounded that an operation of that size can move forward with such ill-thought-out plans and are now scrambling to make amendments.”

  • Hardeehar@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 year ago

    Who would want to write new games for a company that can just screw you later?

    • elouboub@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Probably enough people to keep Unity afloat. Let’s be honest, who’s going to reskill their gamedevs to learn Godot or some other game engine? Decision makers will probably spend more money on trying to find ways around the problem than actually solving it aka using another game engine.
      It’s what they do.

      • MomoTimeToDie@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Very few, of any, major studios do their work in entirely one engine. Hell, plenty of studios develop engines from the ground up for specific games. Plus, a huge amount of the development is stuff that’s going to be engine agnostic. Things like the assets and sound development aren’t based on engine-specific skills at all.