• dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    1 year ago

    Okay so how would this be enforced? Highly unlikely any messaging service that offers E2E is going to release a version without it just to satisfy the UK government. So this will basically be easily thwarted by using a VPN?

    • ADTJ@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      1 year ago

      The bill was changed so it no longer bans e2e encryption, it’s now the responsibility of tech companies to provide protection “where technically feasible” which basically means fuck all

      • milicent_bystandr@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        where technically feasible

        It gives something that can be argued about later, right? After other parts of the bill have begun to be implemented. So, further down the road if gvmt considers e.g. WhatsApp or Signal as having CSAM and not taking appropriate steps, then they can put pressure and WA/Signal can argue back about feasibility and merit.

        • sic_1@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Does that mean that when you’re sitting on a bench in the middle of a city, you could in theory snoop the passwords and banking details in clear text from the WiFi networks around you?

    • El_Dorado@beehaw.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s the lovely bit about putting a bill out there. The enforcement and feasibility is not the problem of the politicians anymore.