☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml to Programmer Humor@lemmy.mlEnglish · 1 year agoWhen programmers see Lisplemmy.mlimagemessage-square18fedilinkarrow-up1101arrow-down117
arrow-up184arrow-down1imageWhen programmers see Lisplemmy.ml☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml to Programmer Humor@lemmy.mlEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square18fedilink
minus-squarecadekat@pawb.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up0·1 year agoThe real interesting debate is between ((f) 1) and f()(1).
minus-square☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down9·1 year agoI personally find ((f) 1) easier to read. You just go inside out, evaluate f, then pass 1 as the argument to the output of f. There’s no ambiguity regarding order of evaluation there.
The real interesting debate is between
((f) 1)andf()(1).I personally find
((f) 1)easier to read. You just go inside out, evaluatef, then pass1as the argument to the output off. There’s no ambiguity regarding order of evaluation there.