Ah yes, the Sam Vimes “Boots” Theory of Economic Unfairness:
The reason that the rich were so rich, Vimes reasoned, was because they managed to spend less money. Take boots, for example. … A man who could afford fifty dollars had a pair of boots that’d still be keeping his feet dry in ten years’ time, while a poor man who could only afford cheap boots would have spent a hundred dollars on boots in the same time and would still have wet feet.
More frugal than buy-for-life but: good shoes. Twice the price but they last way longer. It’s cheaper in the end.
Ah yes, the Sam Vimes “Boots” Theory of Economic Unfairness:
GNU PTerry.
I’ll add that using a shoe horn has tripled the life of my shoes.