If you get a message from someone you never matched with on Tinder, it’s not a glitch — it’s part of the app’s expensive new subscription plan that it teased earlier this year, which allows “power users” to send unsolicited messages to non-matches for the small fee of $499 per month.

That landscape, in fact, is largely populated by apps owned by Tinder’s parent company: as Bloomberg notes, Match Group Inc. not only owns the popular swiping app, but also Match.com, OKCupid, Hinge, and The League.

Match Group CEO Bernard Kim referred to Tinder’s subscriptions as “low-hanging fruit” meant to compete with other, pricier services, though that was before this $6,000-per-year tier dropped.

  • ParsnipWitch@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Many years ago™ OkCupid actually had a good system, before it revamped itself and got bought by Match (Tinder).

    In the old version of the website, you could answer any amount of questions from a huge catalogue of sometimes very obscure and specific questions and look for people who had very similar (or very different) answers overall. You could chat freely with everyone and had the option to look just for (platonic) friends.

    I had incredibly interesting discussions with people who were at the opposite spectrum of my answers. And I made a few acquaintances and two amazing friends who still are my friends today, one is even my roommate for 8 years now! I also found a group of white hackers and Linux enthusiasts for real life meetings and we still hang out occasionally.

    Two other friends of mine looked for and found romantic partners there and they are both happily married to the partners they found via OkCupid back then.

    It went all down the gutter when people used the “platonic friends” option to get into your pants.

    And when OkCupid tried to make more cash by pushing into the sex/romance market more and copying dating apps.

    I don’t think something like this would work anymore. Dating apps and the weird culture and thinking about a “sexual market” seem to have broken humans or something. This asinine idea is just another symptom.

    • Aaron@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      More old trivia is that the original OK Cupid system was written in C, including the actual web server that served the pages. They wrote it in C so that the matching thing could run real-time, which is super impressive, even if writing your own web server is actually pretty dumb.

      I loved the days when people just wanted to make fun, useful, quirky stuff on the internet and not just peddle thirst traps and Chinese merchandise.

    • Crotaro@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      OkCupid really used to be awesome. I would not have met my spouse, had I not checked it out because of the amazingly interesting and varied questionnaires.

      I’m so sad that it was made shitty.

    • renard_roux@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      My wife and I actually met on OkCupid, happily married for 8 years now, and dated a few years before that, so safe to say I haven’t been there in 10+ years.

      Sad to hear it’s gone down the drain, it seemed the least vile of the available options 😓

    • cicapocok@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I also met my boyfriend back then like 7 years ago. It was the best “dating platform” that I ever used. Had a lot of great conversations with many people all over the world. Came back to it a few years ago but they already changed it to a more tinder type of way. It was very disappointing.

    • SeriousBug@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Did they get rid of the questions? That was the most awesome part of OkCupid. Because you not only answered the questions but you could pick if you cared what your potential matches answers should be.

      I met my wife on OkCupid, we were a high % match according to OkCupid and we did turn out to be a great match. That’s stupid if they got rid of that.

      • Beto@lemmy.studio
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        There’s a big conflict of interest in dating apps: if you’re successful you stop using the app, and of course the company doesn’t want that.

        • theUnlikely@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          But if everyone has a shitty experience with it, they won’t recommend it or even tell people to stay away from it. But if it works well, they’ll praise it, thus gaining more users.

          • interolivary@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            And enshittification and buying up competitors will lead to all sites being the same, which is exactly what has happened. Executives don’t care about providing a useful service, they just care about getting richer

    • fox@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Absolutely LOVED the questionnaire aspect of okcupid. At one point I ran out of questions you could answer. Met some fantastic people using the app.

    • SnowdenHeroOfOurTime@unilem.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Another version of “online dating is awful!”

      Haven’t heard this one before. The world is better with online dating than it was without it

      • Axolotling@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        That’s not what the original comment said if you read it at all. The commenter was making the point that okcupid was pretty good before it was enshittified. There was no direct judgement about whether the world is better with or without OLD. And the subtextual judgment seems to be positive or at least neutral, so I’m not sure what you actually have a problem with.

        • SnowdenHeroOfOurTime@unilem.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          How I saw this as a different version of the same old stuff is that this comment said essentially “well it used to be good when I used it, but now it’s awful and destructive” which it might be in ways but it’s absolutely a net positive from what I have seen

          As someone who online dated for years, up until 2021, I’m very aware of the down sides.

          • Axolotling@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            Okay that makes more sense. I do think that “online dating is awful” is a very different statement from “well it used to be good but now it sucks” and the two phrases come with very different qualifications and conclusions.

            The former phrase is a pretty blanket judgement on this aspect of society in relation to the whole. But the latter statement has more to do with the enshittification of the internet and the capitalist systems woven inbetween. The latter statement is a historical comparison while the former is a value judgment of society.

            As for your opinion itself, I don’t have any strong feelings one way or another. The nature of the internet has paradoxically connected more people than ever before while simultaneously isolating us more than ever before. I personally don’t think that online dating really differs from that mold. I think that this is one small part of a larger problem where capitalism has commodified almost every aspect of humanity, which is accelerated by the internet.

            • SnowdenHeroOfOurTime@unilem.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Yeah, this is all fair. I’ve just heard that online dating is bad so many times and so often that it’s become expected. I feel like it typically comes from people who either have never used it, or have only dated that way. Both groups have a less informed opinion than someone who went on a few mortifying “traditional” dates, and then started dating online.

              I’m not trying to say I’m an expert but I do think people my age are in a unique position. We saw the world before and after the Internet, and since this change occurred in our youth we had enough awareness to process both versions of the world. If we put some laws into place that protected consumers on a basic level, I sure would drastically prefer the post Internet world. As it stands, some days I don’t feel like the Internet is such a great thing, but most days I do think it’s a better world, on balance.