Speaking as a total ignorant from a coding perspective. But I guess that wouldn’t be the hard part, considering that most of Duolinguo is just boxes and text inputs. How difficult it is to create a database of competent linguists with an efficient training who can progressively enhance your understanding of languages?

  • bdonvr@thelemmy.club
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m not convinced that model of learning is really effective anyway. At best, it’s a fun-ish time killer where you learn a bit about language.

    • JustEnoughDucks@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      As someone who is at around a high B2/low C1 level in Dutch now and moved to Belgium and used dualingo in the beginning I have a bit of insight into it.

      It doesn’t do shit for grammar and sentence structure, but it builds vocabulary. If you learn only with dualingo, you will probably make a lot of mistakes, flipped adverbs, verbs in the wrong place, sentence structure errors, etc…

      It definitely made me feel like I could speak Dutch because I could read it MUCH better after 1/2 of the dualingo course, but then when I moved, speaking was pretty bad and I had only moved up to an A2 level with the vocab of maybe B1. You definitely cannot become semi-fluent or fluent with dualingo. It doesn’t teach, it only helps practice what you have already been taught.