• CorneliusTalmadge@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    1 year ago

    Image Text

    BRACKEYS

    Hello everyone!

    It’s been a while. I hope you are all well.

    Unity has recently taken some actions to change their pricing policy that I - like most of the community - do not condone in any way.

    I have been using Unity for more than 10 years and the product has been very important to me. However, Unity is a public company. Unfortunately that means that it has to serve shareholder interests. Sometimes those interests align with what is best for the developers and sometimes they do not. While this has been the case for a while, these recent developments have made it increasingly clear.

    Unity has pulled back on the first version of their new pricing policy and made some changes to make it less harmful to small studios, but it is important to remember that the realities of a public company are not going to change.

    Luckily, there are other ways of structuring the development of software. Instead of a company owning and controlling software with a private code base, software can be open source (with a public code base that anyone can contribute to) and publicly owned. Blender - a stable 3D modelling software in the game dev community - is free and open source. In fact some of the largest and most advanced software in the world is built on top of open source technology like Linux.

    The purpose of this post is not to denounce Unity because of a misstep, to criticise any of its employees or to tell anyone to “jump ship”. Instead I want to highlight the systematic issue of organizing large software projects under a public company and to let you know that there are alternatives.

    I believe that the way to a stronger and more healthy game dev community is through software created by the community for the community. Software that is open source, democratically owned and community funded.

    Many of you have been asking for us to produce new tutorial series on alternative engines such as Godot, which is currently the most advanced open source and community funded game engine. I don’t know yet if this is something that we can realise and when.

    I can only say that I have started learning Godot.

    Best of luck to all of you with your games, no matter what engine they might be built on!

    Sincerely,

    Asbjern Thirslund - Brackeys

  • CordanWraith@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m not a big fan of his videos for my own use, but he has done amazing things for the community and I hope he’s able to do the same for Godot

  • mrsgreenpotato@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    That would be amazing to have Brackeys tutorials on Godot. You can already see a difference in the influx of new tutorials and channels around that topic, and I feel like it’ll just grow.

  • Sanctus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Thanks, Brackeys. You’ve helped me out in tremendous ways in Unity. Here’s to hoping we both love Godot!

  • Spzi@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    A very nice way to deal with the situation. I like how it’s both clear and free from hatred.

    The purpose of this post is not to denounce Unity because of a misstep, to criticise any of its employees or to tell anyone to “jump ship”. Instead I want to highlight the systematic issue of organizing large software projects under a public company and to let you know that there are alternatives.

    I believe him, but for a moment I asked myself - Is this maybe a chiffre to say the opposite? Nah, anyways.

    Very happy to see Brackeys highlighting systemic issues and promoting FOSS.

    Looks like Godot-Unity had their Lemmy-reddit moment?