• rambaroo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    15
    ·
    1 year ago

    I said some dumb things too, but not “child porn isn’t abuse and should be legal”. That’s straight up predatory. You can’t tell me a 16 year old shouldn’t know better

    • Norah - She/They@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yes, I can. 16 years old is a child. I also live in one of the first jurisdictions in the world to legalise 15-17yo sexting images. I wonder if his frustration came from restrictions he faced at the time. I thought it was pretty dumb as a teen that I couldn’t take a picture of my own naked body. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

    • Wollff@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      “child porn isn’t abuse and should be legal”

      I think that this is not true. It definitely is abuse. But I also think that the argument for why it is so, is not that trivial.

      I mean, can you make it? Try it out!

      Let’s say someone distributes CP. How does what happens here, the sending of 0s and 1s across a wire, constitute abuse?

      If you think about it like that, it doesn’t.

      Of course if you take into account a broader context, then this argument does break down. For the details you would probably need complex words and terms like “retraumatization” and “inability to consent”, and “right to one’s own image”, and know a bit about what those things are, and how they work.

      I wouldn’t expect every 16 year old today to be able to get all of that straight. And I would not expect any 16 year old in the early 2000s, an age long, long before metoo, and any sensitivity toward sexual trauma, to be able to get that.