I was looking through the megathread and saw this real-debrid thing. I have heard this name some times so I read what it does but wasn’t able to understand it. If someone could explain it to me I would appreciate it.

Also, it caught my attention that “it’s a good way to prevent your IP from ever hitting the torrent’s swarm, which is the main cause of receiving copyright infringement letters”. Does this mean it’s an alternative to a VPN when torrenting? Is it like a seedboxes or something? Are there any free alternatives?

  • Sasori323@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Real-Debrid conceals your traffic from your ISP by using HTTPS, but the service does keep track of your IPs. It’s best to create the account using an email untraceable to you, pay for the service with crypto or paysafecard and always use a VPN when logging in to the site or streaming

    In the megathread it says it is a good way of hiding your IP, but you’re saying it isn’t totally secure. What exactly is the danger of not applying the security methods you’ve told?

    • mestari@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Real-Debrid logs your all data. If they’re ever hacked or cracked down by police, you can be in danger. In many countries there’s a risk of heavy fines if you get caught pirating media.

      • Elektrotechnik@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Very much depends on the country, though. In Germany for example, it is illegal to actively share media (so upload via torrent), but it’s “legal” (ie, not fineable) to stream or download via one-click-hosters.

        • ninakuup21@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          A relative of mine that lives in germany told me that it used to be like that but it got changed 5-6 years ago, is he maybe misinformed?

          • Elektrotechnik@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I just looked into it briefly and you’re right, there seems to have been some development:

            Full text: https://www.juraforum.de/news/boersebz-direct-downloads-verletzen-urheberrechte_247270

            Translation: Criminal liability of the downloader

            However, users who download this data also infringe copyrights if it is obvious to a reasonable and fair-minded person that the public presentation (the offer on the servers of the one-click hoster) is made without the permission of the actual rights holder. This is certainly the case if, for example, a film is offered before its theatrical release. However, the obviousness should also be given after the theatrical release, since no one can expect a film production company to make its films available free of charge on servers of one-click hosts.

            Translated with www.DeepL.com/Translator (free version)

            It also states that downloaders are currently not being pursued, because it is too difficult to prove.

          • Chewy@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            It is officially illegal since a few years ago. But they usually don’t go after some person who streamed something, since it’s really not worth the effort.