• Muddybulldog@mylemmy.win
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    RedHat is not going closed source. All the code is still open source. Nobody is getting sued for looking at it.

      • Muddybulldog@mylemmy.win
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I’ve seen them. I understand them. I’m correct.

        Not making their sources generally available for download is NOT the same as closed source. The only ones subject to their new licensing agreements are their paying customers. They are very much pushing against the spirit of FOSS licenses but there is no potential for some Joe on the street to get sued for looking at their source code.

          • Muddybulldog@mylemmy.win
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            You think you are talking to a very different person than you actually are.

            Not making their package sources generally available for download is NOT the same as closed source. The only ones subject to their new licensing agreements are their paying customers. They are very much pushing against the spirit of FOSS licenses but there is no potential for some Joe on the street to get sued for looking at their source code.

            • Raphael@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              but there is no potential for some Joe on the street to get sued for looking at their source code.

              But how would that Joe look at the source code if it not publicly available and he’s not a paying customer?

              Checkmate.