• jet@hackertalks.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    This is a great write up. I kind of wish they went into the security aspects of metadata leaking. But otherwise really love this write up

  • Pasta Dental@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    FYI, Conversations, the most popular XMPP client on Android is going to be getting a Material 3 redesign soon-ish. You can check out the “c3” on their Codeberg repo to see where it’s at, but from what I’ve seen, it’s promising!

    • rhymepurple@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Didn’t know about this. That’s interesting!

      Are you referring to this c3 branch? If so, there havent been any commits or pull requests for a few months now. Is there a timeline posted anywhere for the “soon-ish” release of the redesign?

      • Pasta Dental@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah I meant the c3 branch, and I have no clue about the timeline the dev is aiming for, though I recall them saying they wanted to release it this year, but that could have changed by now

        • rhymepurple@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Thanks for confirming.

          XMPP really needs better clients - even the good ones feel dated. Hopefully the timeline was not pushed back too much, if at all, and that this redesign can be the start of modernizing XMPP clients.

          • Pasta Dental@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yeah, the XMPP client landscape is pretty bad. Mostly 10+ year old clients that did not have a refreshed UI ever since. The only one I really like and is modern is Dino on Linux. It’s a very neat looking client that also happens to be responsive to it works on small screens and even Linux mobiles!

            • toastal@lemmy.mlOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              KDE’s Kaiden is modern and ready for Plasma Mobile. Gajim looks modern enough (tho not in small splits). TUIs never really go out of fashion for their crowds.

      • 👁️👄👁️@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Conversations is paid and has like 100k downloads, and it looks like it’s from Android kitkat. The other two don’t even exist on the app store. Do you consider these to be popular? I’m looking for actual popular apps, just like I can say Element for Matrix.

        • toastal@lemmy.mlOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Wat. Conversations is on F-Droid… and it’s the basis for Blabber, Cheogram, Monocles, etc. It’s the most influential XMPP application in the Android space.

          • 👁️👄👁️@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Literally never heard of any of those, or see any community link to them. Is that really what XMPP considers their most bleeding edge clients?

            • toastal@lemmy.mlOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              1 year ago

              Then you need to meet more communities 😅

              Also for the sake of chat, what’s something truly innovative since the heyday of AIM & IRC? There just isn’t many useful bells & whistles to be added in the last decade. The newer XEPs for stickers+message reactions have been out with some new clients picking them up, but these aren’t something fundamentally changing how folks speak.

                • toastal@lemmy.mlOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  I was referring to the experience (encryption is usually felt as something transparent after it’s set up). However both Matrix & XMPP have e2ee even if the implementation isn’t identical (OMEMO allows per device).

                  What is “asymmetric communication”? Only one side can talk?

      • toastal@lemmy.mlOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Gajim, Profanity. There’s probably a Weechat plugin. There’s also handful of JS ones, but I like the polish of Movim (and it’s also a client for an entire decentralized social media platform if you want it to be).

      • toastal@lemmy.mlOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Doesn’t support OMEMO for encryption, just OTR which is quite limiting given how most folks tend to chat on multiple devices now.

    • HughJanus@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      XMPP is great but the clients are all really bad.

      Session is where it’s at.

  • LaggyKar@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Why does it call XMPP “Chat Standard”?

    From the perspective of private users, WhatsApp is the benchmark

    Not entirely, there is also Discord

    • toastal@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      WhatsApp, Signal, & some others use the same open standardization end-to-end encryption. It’s the bare minimum bar for acceptable (but most of these apps require a primary Android/iOS device to hold the key which plays right into that duopoly as well as making smart phones a requirement rather than optional).

      Discord has no e2ee, many rooms require phone numbers, the service is proprietary, they have trackers, they send cease & desists to projects wanting to be alternate clients. These are not the hallmarks for privacy or security.

    • jaykstah@waveform.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Tbh I have not really encountered people saying they use Discord for privacy reasons, usually it’s people complaining about the privacy implications of discord