• Dojan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      Isn’t Arch a lot of manual compilation? Like I do that shit for work, I don’t want to do it in my free-time too.

    • pazukaza@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I use Ubuntu. I think it’s funny how Arch users immediately assume they know more about Linux than me because of my distro choice. My hobby is learning about Linux and I can do that perfectly from my Ubuntu machine.

      I’ve used Arch in the past, and let me tell you, nothing crazy is going on in there.

      Yes, Ubuntu sucks because they are forcing Snaps on people while snaps are slow as hell. Thankfully they haven’t fully shoved snaps down our throats. If they don’t make snaps faster before shoving them down my throat, I’ll just distro hop. Probably to Debian. I love Debian.

        • beneeney@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Arch user here. I have no idea what I’m doing. Killing Floor just crashed my graphics card or something to crash and my monitors aren’t working after reboots. Oh god

        • Raistlin@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Honestly I’ve found it to be surprisingly stable, and the only time the system broke, it was my own fault.

          • IriYan@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            I’ve found it to be surprisingly stable

            It sounds like you have used it extensively then, because the myth is spread by people who never tried.

        • IriYan@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Arch users HAVE to know

          They do know this is a popular myth spread around by the antiquities of debian/mint/ubuntu users who wait a few years for Arch users to locate any bugs.

        • stappern@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          come on this is getting old, people are sitting on multi year systems that have never broke…

      • /home/pineapplelover@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I went from Ubuntu to Arch and I think I’m here to stay. Ubuntu was unstable for me for some reason. I would get freezes and crashes all the time. I feel like Canonical is making things slower and bloated but I have had pretty smooth experiences with Linux mint. On Arch I’ve been getting amazing uptime. But to each ones own, if you like it, who am I to judge.

        • christophski@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’m considering leaving Ubuntu. I’m currently looking at Manjaro because I don’t think I have enough time to invest in learning arch. Any tips?

          • prim3r@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            One of my favorite features of arch is the aur, and because manjaro lags behind arch releases, you can run into trouble. If you want arch without the install difficulties, I would try something like endeaver os or garuda. You’ll end up with actual arch in the end and you wont end up with some of outdated certs or whanever manjaro ucks up nowadays.

            • crunchpaste@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              While you’re absolutely correct, in my personal experience Manjaro has been perfectly stable even with somewhat heavy use of the AUR.

              • Salacian@lemmynsfw.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Mine too, but I did switch because I needed to reinstall and I would have just swiched out most of the tools that come preinstalled, to the point I didn’t know why I would even use manjaro instead of arch if I’m reinstlling everything anyway…

          • /home/pineapplelover@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            People on the internet say to read the wiki and follow the directions but I’m a much more visual learner. If you follow this video, you should be all good if you want to use vanilla Arch. I do not have experience with Manjaro but one of my friends said he used it once and he enjoyed it. Though his cmos battery died and the OS bricked so he switched to Linux Mint. Installing arch might take around 30 min or an hour so it’s not the hardest thing ever. I would recommend the archinstall script but that has never worked for me, if you can manage to use that script, setup is even easier.

            https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=68z11VAYMS8

            https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G-mLyrHonvU

    • guriinii@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I moved to simpler distros after years of using Arch and derivatives… I just can’t be arsed any more.

    • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      22.04 LTS gang

      Honestly, it’s kinda my default general purpose linux distro at this point. Set it up bare bones and headless, rip out snap, and do what you want.