• evo@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    No, Apple won on some technicalities.

    1. They don’t have a major market share globally (despite their larger market share in the US).
    2. Epic’s case was focused on games, which don’t make up the majority of revenue for the App Store, apparently
    • helenslunch@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      They don’t have a major market share globally (despite their larger market share in the US).

      The case was in a US court but the court was only concerned with their global market share?

      How does this have anything to do with market share anyway? They could have 1% and it would still be wrong.

      Epic’s case was focused on games

      I don’t understand what the difference is. Games are functionally and financially the same as every other app in the store.

      • evo@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        How does this have anything to do with market share anyway?

        Are you serious or are you just trolling? This is an anti trust lawsuit. The definition of antitrust is preventing abuse of monopolies. And the definition of a monopoly is “controlling most or all of the market share” or something.

        • helenslunch@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          My brother in Christ, if you think any size company should be allowed to engage in anticompetitive activities then we have nothing more to discuss.