Waffelson@lemmy.world to linuxmemes@lemmy.world · 11 months ago:wq!lemmy.worldimagemessage-square114fedilinkarrow-up1217arrow-down168
arrow-up1149arrow-down1image:wq!lemmy.worldWaffelson@lemmy.world to linuxmemes@lemmy.world · 11 months agomessage-square114fedilink
minus-square👍Maximum Derek👍@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up21arrow-down2·11 months ago:ggdGwq (please don’t do this)
minus-squareJustinAngel@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up14arrow-down1·11 months agoVIM Golf… Same outcome, fewer strokes: %d|wq
minus-squareitslilith@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up7arrow-down1·11 months agoyou can replace wq with x :%d|x
minus-squareIgnotum@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up11·11 months agoI use Vim daily, and i have absolutely no clue what that command would do, what would it do? Delete the document, save and quit?
minus-squarefiliberto_kunstlinger@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up15·edit-211 months agoexactly. gg -> go to top of document d -> delete (actually, it’s cut, but it destroys the mnemonic) G -> here is a modifier to “d” and tells it do “delete until end of document” w -> write current state of buffer to disk q -> exit program
minus-squareMiku Luna \ she/it@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up16·11 months agoActually not, binds and commands aren’t the same. ggdG only works as a series of inputs, while wq only works as a command (with the colon).
minus-squareVictor@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up7·11 months agoExactly. The colon needs to be just before the w, not at the front of the sequence…
minus-squareCaptainBlagbird@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up6·11 months agoAnd while you’re at it, throw an ESC in there at the beginning, will ya?
minus-squareVictor@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·11 months agoIf you want to cover every case (mode), indeed. 😊
minus-square👍Maximum Derek👍@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·11 months agoyeah, I screwed it up
minus-squaresurewhynotlem@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·11 months ago gg Huh… I always just used :1
minus-squareMiku Luna \ she/it@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up11·11 months agoE492: Not an editor command: ggdGwq
minus-squarei_am_tired_boss@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down1·11 months agoggdGZZ This actually does what you intend to do. On nvim atleast.
:ggdGwq (please don’t do this)
VIM Golf… Same outcome, fewer strokes:
%d|wq
you can replace wq with x
:%d|x
Only in Vim, not in Vi.
I use Vim daily, and i have absolutely no clue what that command would do, what would it do? Delete the document, save and quit?
exactly.
gg -> go to top of document
d -> delete (actually, it’s cut, but it destroys the mnemonic)
G -> here is a modifier to “d” and tells it do “delete until end of document”
w -> write current state of buffer to disk
q -> exit program
Actually not, binds and commands aren’t the same.
ggdGonly works as a series of inputs, whilewqonly works as a command (with the colon).Exactly. The colon needs to be just before the
w, not at the front of the sequence…And while you’re at it, throw an
ESCin there at the beginning, will ya?If you want to cover every case (mode), indeed. 😊
yeah, I screwed it up
Huh… I always just used :1
E492: Not an editor command: ggdGwqggdGZZ
This actually does what you intend to do. On nvim atleast.