Built a nice little PiKVM and deployed it in my NAS. The NAS is heavy and placed in a dark half-height place under the stairs so it’s awkward when things go wrong and you need hardware access.

The built KVM

For those that don’t know what PiKVM is: https://pikvm.org/

  • cygnus@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    11 months ago

    So it’s a computer that lets you remotely control another computer? Is the advantage over SSH or remote desktop etc that you can interact with stuff outside the OS, like in BIOS?

    • redcalcium@lemmy.institute
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      That’s basically it. It guarantees you can always access your computer remotely, even if you broke your ssh, or accidentally messed up your network config, or can’t boot due to filesystem corruption and need to run fsck from recovery mode.

      • Prizephitah@feddit.nuOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        11 months ago

        Exactly, it isn’t a replacement. It is redundancy in the form of a screen with keyboard and mouse directly connected, but accessibly from remote (my couch). It is far from my primary interface with the server.

    • misophist@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      11 months ago

      Yes. This is home-made out-of-band management, like HP’s iLO, Dell’s iDRAC, or generic IPMI. Not only is it a virtual KVM (keyboard/video/mouse), you can pass the host’s power button through this device so you can remotely power on or reset a hung or powered-off system, or mount and boot from a virtual floppy or ISO to completely reinstall the remote system.

      • MatFi@lemmy.thias.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Cool, So actually something one could build out of anything with an USB, Ethernet port. But not sure how to add the Display receiver… They using a RPi for this as well. I don’t like that it occupies Video connector. Lots of systems only have a single one

        • Prizephitah@feddit.nuOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          11 months ago

          It’s kind of the point here to occupy the video out as this is a server and has no screen connected otherwise. Normally it doesn’t need one.

          • MatFi@lemmy.thias.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            I have to admit, that this might be true the very most cases. But there are more reasons why servers still have a video-port.